Fitch Forecasts Three Years of Negative Free Cash Flow for Universal Entertainment
Rating agency cites VIP collapse, online migration and JPY19bn EBITDA through 2028

Key Takeaways
- Fitch expects Universal Entertainment Corp to post negative free cash flow in 2026 and 2027 and projects annual EBITDA of about JPY19 billion through 2028.
- Okada Manila's VIP share fell to 20% of gross gaming revenue in 2025 from 35% in 2023, weakening group performance.
- Okada Manila reported 2Q26 net sales of JPY30.1 billion, a 13.0% year-on-year decline, and Adjusted EBITDA of JPY2.74 billion, down 62.5%.
- Okada Manila accounts for around 53% of Universal Entertainment's group revenue, leaving the company materially exposed.
Fitch Ratings expects Universal Entertainment Corp (UEC) to record negative free cash flow for at least the next three years after weakness at its Philippine integrated resort Okada Manila depressed group profits. The agency revised its rating case to assume subdued EBITDA and negative free cash flow in 2026 and 2027, with annual EBITDA of about JPY19 billion (US$120 million) through 2028 — below the roughly JPY20 billion (US$127 million) UEC needs to cover cash interest and capital expenditure.
Fitch's view on Universal Entertainment free cash flow and EBITDA
Fitch's analysis singles out Okada Manila's deterioration as the principal swing factor for Universal Entertainment Corp's credit profile. The report notes a structural collapse in the Philippines' VIP gaming segment, migration to online channels and broader macroeconomic headwinds as the drivers that have suppressed Adjusted EBITDA "below profitable levels." The agency says these pressures are likely to continue to constrain revenue and EBITDA recovery at the integrated resort.
Fitch stated:
"Competition, online migration and macroeconomic headwinds are likely to continue limiting integrated resort revenue and EBITDA recovery."
The ratings house quantified its downside case. It expects UEC's annual EBITDA to be about JPY19 billion through 2028, compared with the approximately JPY20 billion required roughly to cover cash interest and capex. That gap, Fitch argues, will reduce the company's liquidity headroom despite there being no material debt maturities due before August 2029.
How Okada Manila's market mix drove the downgrade
Okada Manila's VIP mix has contracted sharply, according to Fitch. The agency highlighted that VIP accounted for just 20% of Okada Manila's gross gaming revenue in 2025, down from 35% in 2023. The ratings house said the mass-market player base, which is lower-spending, has not been sufficient to make up the shortfall left by the VIP decline.
UEC disclosed operational results that underline the pressure at the resort. For the second quarter of 2026, Okada Manila reported net sales of JPY30.1 billion (US$191 million), a 13.0% year-on-year decline, and Adjusted EBITDA of JPY2.74 billion (US$17.4 million), a 62.5% decline year-on-year. The resort recorded an operating loss of JPY1.37 billion (US$8.7 million) in that quarter.
Okada Manila also faces intensifying competition inside Entertainment City and an online market in the Philippines the agency describes as "nascent," with the newly launched platform not yet a material revenue contributor.
Group exposure, pachinko recovery and management assessment
Universal Entertainment remains exposed because Okada Manila still accounts for the majority of group revenue. Fitch estimated that Okada Manila comprises around 53% of UEC's group revenue, leaving the company materially concentrated in a single, underperforming asset.
Fitch acknowledged a recent recovery in UEC's pachinko and pachislot manufacturing arm, noting the segment offers "some diversification and near-term recovery potential." The ratings house nevertheless framed the long-term outlook for pachinko and pachislot as constrained by structural decline in the domestic Japanese market, meaning the recovery is insufficient to offset the Philippine weakness.
The report was also critical of UEC's management. Fitch described management as having an "unpredictable risk appetite, erratic strategy and lack of clear measures to address the deterioration in its integrated resort operations." That assessment raises concerns about the company's ability to execute corrective steps.
What UEC says it will do and immediate financial implications
Universal Entertainment has signalled a strategy pivot, saying it will focus on the Philippine mass market and its new online gaming platform to try to improve Okada Manila's performance. Fitch, however, emphasised that the online platform remains an early-stage contributor and will not materially change the group's near-term cash generation.
Under Fitch's revised case, the company will likely register negative free cash flow in 2026 and 2027. The combination of lower EBITDA and ongoing cash interest and capex means liquidity headroom will shrink, even though the next significant debt maturities fall after August 2029.
Implications for lenders, investors and suppliers
Lenders and bondholders will monitor three variables closely:
Okada Manila revenue mix, especially any reversal in the VIP contribution.
The pace at which the Philippines online platform gains material revenue share.
Stability of cash interest and capital expenditure requirements relative to EBITDA.
For suppliers and platform vendors, the clear near-term consequence is that the integrated resort may have reduced discretionary spend while management pursues mass-market and online strategies. Investors should treat Fitch's JPY19 billion EBITDA assumption and the JPY20 billion breakeven threshold as the immediate financial metrics that will determine whether UEC restores positive free cash flow.
Where this sits in the regional market
Okada Manila's decline follows a broader contraction in high-end VIP flows across regional markets, amplified by online migration. The Philippines' domestic online gaming market remains early-stage and not yet a counterweight to lost VIP volume. Operators active in the market will watch whether UEC's pivot to the mass segment and online platform produces measurable revenue gains in coming quarters.
For readers tracking regulatory or market developments, the situation at Okada Manila ties into broader questions about how integrated resorts in Entertainment City will balance VIP, mass and online channels while managing capex and financing over the next three years.
Oliver Grant, Industry Technology Correspondent
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does Fitch expect negative free cash flow for Universal Entertainment in 2026–27?
Fitch expects negative free cash flow because it projects subdued EBITDA and annual EBITDA of about JPY19 billion through 2028, which is below the roughly JPY20 billion needed to cover cash interest and capital expenditure. The ratings agency cites Okada Manila's VIP decline, online migration and macroeconomic headwinds as the drivers of the subdued EBITDA.
How much did Okada Manila's VIP contribution fall between 2023 and 2025?
VIP contribution to Okada Manila's gross gaming revenue fell from 35% in 2023 to 20% in 2025. Fitch says the lower-spending mass segment did not offset the decline.
What were Okada Manila's financial results in the second quarter of 2026?
Okada Manila reported net sales of JPY30.1 billion (US$191 million) in 2Q26, a 13.0% year-on-year decrease, with Adjusted EBITDA of JPY2.74 billion (US$17.4 million), down 62.5%, and an operating loss of JPY1.37 billion (US$8.7 million).
Does Universal Entertainment have any diversification beyond Okada Manila?
Universal Entertainment operates a pachinko and pachislot manufacturing arm that Fitch said offers some diversification and near-term recovery potential, but the ratings house described the long-term outlook for that segment as constrained by structural market decline in Japan.
Tags
About the author

Oliver Grant
Industry Technology Correspondent
Oliver Grant covers the technology and business machinery of iGaming — platform and data deals, AI and compliance tooling, affiliate and marketing shifts, and the quarterly numbers behind them. The reports lead with the announcement, name the vendors and figures exactly as published, and separate genuine capability from press-release promise. When a supplier ships a new engine or a regulator tightens ad rules, Oliver Grant explains what actually changes for the companies involved.
More from Oliver Grant








