iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Poker

Wicked Chops Poker: The Rebels Who Revolutionized Poker Coverage

Wicked Chops Poker changed the industry's narrative during the poker boom, generating controversies, innovating with irreverent content, and leaving a mark on specialized media.

By Sofía CarrascoPublished Sep 9, 20265 min read
Composite photo of Steve Preiss and the founders of Wicked Chops Poker during the WSOP with scenes from the boom era.

Key Takeaways

  • Wicked Chops Poker introduced controversial and disruptive coverage during the poker boom.
  • Irreverent content and editorial independence earned them loyal followers and public enemies.
  • Steve Preiss and the team influenced the integration of audiovisual media and podcasts into poker coverage.
  • Regulation and current challenges make it difficult to replicate the cultural rise of 2004-2010.
  • The legacy of Wicked Chops remains in the professionalization and creativity of today's media.

Wicked Chops Poker redefined professional poker coverage during the boom years, mixing satire, unprecedented access to key poker figures, and a distinctive style that attracted both fervent followers and furious detractors. Its impact, followed by the professional evolution of Steve "Chops" Preiss in leading online operators, marked a hard-to-ignore era whose repercussions are still resonating in the industry.

The Genesis of Wicked Chops Poker

The project was born in Atlanta in 2004, as a result of an informal weekly game among friends dedicated to marketing and public relations. Steve Preiss and brothers Colin and Brian Cooley, from their agency Wicked+, identified the opportunity to fill the void left by limited media and blog coverage of the time. "Initially, we struggled to gain an audience. It took a year for something to explode, and by 2006, during the WSOP, we were surpassing 250,000 monthly visits," recalled Preiss about the origins.

From their inception, the platform adopted an approach similar to TMZ and MAXIM of that period: coverage sprinkled with pop culture, irreverence, and unusual access to players and celebrities. Names like Phil Hellmuth, Daniel Negreanu, or even outside personalities like Wil Wheaton interacted with the creators of Wicked Chops, generating exclusive material.

Scandals, Rivalries, and Explosive Prop Bets in the Poker Boom

The outlet did not shy away from controversy: the infamous golf bet that almost ended Erick Lindgren, the open feud with Amarillo Slim —who sought out the founders during the WSOP, accompanied by bodyguards and with less-than-peaceful intentions— set the bold tone of the site.

Even celebrities like Anna Benson publicly questioned their relevance and quality, unlike figures like Joanna Krupa who showed their support. The combination of sarcasm and access led to unusual clashes with communities: after a critique of Nickelback, the site faced threats and hostility from the band’s fans.

The "Girls on the Rail" section, accidentally born from a blurred photo during the WSOP, became one of their most popular and controversial features, reflecting the influence of models like MAXIM but taken into the poker environment.

Innovation in Media and Audiovisual Coverage of Tournaments

Wicked Chops Poker was a pioneer in using video during tournaments, supported by their relationship with RawVegas. From interviews with Daniel Negreanu, Phil Hellmuth, or Jennifer Tilly to series like "This Week in Poker" and "Poker2Nite" —launched before the rise of podcasts and YouTube shows in the poker vertical— their focus on shareable segments on social media laid the groundwork for later formats.

Noteworthy episodes included the famous encounter with Russ Hamilton during the "superuser" scandal at UB, where they managed to record a confrontation that was later used by 60 Minutes. "We became a kind of extension of the industry; we preferred to cover that subculture instead of focusing solely on data or hands," explained Preiss.

Relations with Operators, Editorial Independence, and Commercial Rivalries

Independence was one of their banners: by not working as affiliates, Wicked Chops Poker maintained the freedom to objectively criticize or support operators, which attracted both sources and enemies. Their relationship with brands like Bodog —where they were both a PR agency and critics of situations like the Jamie Gold-Crispin Leyser case— illustrated the balance between their roles as consultants and journalists.

In 2009, the story with Epic Poker and Jeffrey Pollack highlighted the challenges of intellectual property in the industry: attempts at brand appropriation led to a contractual conflict and a determined media boycott by the founders of Wicked Chops.

Regulations, Professionalization, and the Future of Online Poker

The maturity of the sector has brought greater regulations in key markets and challenges for the international growth of online poker. Preiss emphasized that restrictive national legislations, such as in the U.S., ultimately encourage migration to unregulated sites and hinder joint liquidity.

"There needs to be a middle ground in taxes and regulation that maintains necessary protections without stifling innovation and growth,” — Steve Preiss.

Despite the consolidation and professionalization of media in the industry —mentioning advances in PokerNews, PokerOrg and the emergence of influential content creators— Preiss observes that to achieve another media "explosion," continued investment in relevant content and regulatory adjustments fostering expansion would be essential.

Advice for New Media and the Future of WSOP Coverage

Preiss emphasizes the importance of authenticity and honesty in content, essential points for maintaining connection with the audience. He advises new creators to be direct and genuine, avoiding half-measures, as a basis for achieving a lasting impact in the community. He points to the development of "mainstream" models and the integration of figures outside the poker core as parts of the format's evolution.

"The audience exists; what’s lacking is investment and strategy for content to become culturally relevant again,” stated Preiss about the future of the boom format.

The Legacy of Wicked Chops and Key Professional Connections

The relationships forged during the Wicked Chops era opened doors in operators like PokerStars, GGPoker, and Churchill Downs for its members. The exchange of information and a willingness to collaborate shaped part of today’s professional fabric, exemplifying how honest journalism can influence the structure of the industry.

Reflecting on those years, many poker professionals recognize the debt of their careers to the openings provided by figures like Brian Balsbaugh (Poker Royalty), John Caldwell (PokerNews), or Preiss himself, from whom they received mentorship and opportunities to advance in their respective fields.

Final Reflection: Is a New Poker Boom Possible?

While Wicked Chops Poker embodies an era that is hard to replicate, the trend toward multiplatform, diversification of voices, and greater presence of creators associated with operators suggests a gradual path to a potential second wave of cultural relevance. The current challenge remains to reconcile regulatory, economic, and creative interests to revitalize poker's social appeal for new generations.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did Wicked Chops Poker emerge and why was it different?

Wicked Chops Poker was born in Atlanta in 2004 as a response to the lack of cultural and celebrity content in poker, betting on a laid-back, bold approach similar to TMZ that broke with the standards of the time.

What controversies did they face during the poker boom?

The outlet challenged figures like Amarillo Slim, faced criticism from celebrities like Anna Benson, and encountered the Nickelback fandom after a satirical post, adopting an openly controversial and uncensored tone.

How did Wicked Chops Poker and its team innovate?

They pioneered the integration of video and shareable formats on social media with shows like 'This Week in Poker' and interviews with key figures, anticipating the rise of podcasts and specialized digital content.

Why was their editorial independence important?

By not relying on affiliate agreements, they maintained the freedom to criticize or support operators based on their actions, building trust among sources and readers and pushing for higher standards in poker media.

What lessons did Wicked Chops leave about the future of poker and its media?

Their story demonstrates that authenticity and investment in relevant content are key to connecting with audiences, although current regulatory and economic challenges pose significant obstacles to a new boom.

Source: Poker.org

Tags

wicked-chops-pokerpoker-boomspecialized-mediaregulationwsop-coverageonline-poker

About the author

Sofía Carrasco

Sofía Carrasco

Poker Correspondent

Sofía Carrasco covers live and online poker — tournament series from the WSOP and EPT to the daily room grind, promotions, and the industry moves behind them. The reports keep every score, pot, and player name exactly as the record shows, and follow the story past the final hand: who qualified, what the structure rewarded, and how the field is shifting. For player moves, software, and regulation across the poker economy, Sofía Carrasco is the first read.

More from Sofía Carrasco

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.