iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Operators

Betfred warns of 45% store closure if MGD tax rises to 40%

Fred Done, founder of Betfred, highlights that 495 stores and 2,575 jobs are at risk if the UK government doubles the duty on gaming machines, following the announcement to close 132 stores due to previous increases.

By Gonzalo MarínPublished Sep 21, 20264 min readEurope
Facade of a Betfred store with closing signs and pedestrians on an English street

Key Takeaways

  • Betfred could close 495 retail stores if the MGD rises to 40% in the UK.
  • The adjustment would jeopardize 2,575 jobs in addition to the 600 already affected by previous closures.
  • The decision would impact Betfred's sponsorship of classic races and reduce funding for the racetrack by £15.8 million.
  • An increase in taxes could result in a £67 million loss in annual tax revenue for the government.
  • Other UK operators such as Entain, Bet365, Flutter, and evoke have also announced layoffs or closures due to current tax changes.

Betfred could close almost half of its retail stores in the UK if the government increases the Machine Games Duty (MGD) from 20% to 40% in the upcoming autumn budget. This warning was issued by Fred Done, the company's founder, in an interview with Financial Times; it would entail 495 stores—45% of its physical operation—resulting in approximately 2,575 job losses, in addition to the already announced closures.

MGD at 40%: direct impact on stores and employment

Done's warning details that raising the MGD to 40% would force Betfred to close 495 stores. This figure adds to the 132 stores already set to close, a change that would leave about 600 people unemployed. The initial closures were a direct response to the increase in the remote gaming duty, which rose from 21% to 40% as ratified in the autumn budget of 2025 by then-Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Furthermore, Reeves proposed increasing the general betting tax from 15% to 25% starting in April 2027. Following changes in the UK Treasury, with John Healey taking over under Andy Burnham's government, a review of a new increase in MGD is being studied for the upcoming October budget.

“I believe there will be no bookmakers left by 2030. The high street will be dead: with tax and wage increases, it is not worth operating. Do you think bettors will stop gambling? No, they will find another way, just like during Prohibition,” Fred Done told the FT.

Done argues that the decision to close stores is a response to unsustainable tax and operational cost increases. The Warrington-based operator estimates that the Treasury would lose around £67 million annually if the MGD rises and Betfred significantly reduces its presence in the retail sector.

Fiscal, labor, and racetrack consequences

An increase in MGD would impact not only the retail network: it would also affect the funding of British horse racing and the state's tax revenues. Done stated in The Sunday Times that if the tax is doubled, Betfred would be forced to withdraw its sponsorship from the five “classic” races in the British calendar—Derby, Oaks, 1,000 Guineas, 2,000 Guineas, and St Leger—a comprehensive coverage initiated in 2024. He explained that there is a verbal agreement to extend this sponsorship for three more years, but its continuation depends on the fiscal policy decided next month.

Should the increase to 40% materialize, Done estimates a reduction of £15.8 million annually in funds for horse racing, a considerable blow to the local horseracing industry. He also lamented the recent equation made in official narratives between betting shops and vaping stores and illegal operators, defending the social and community contributions of the former.

“Our customers are not compulsive gamblers or big bettors: they are workers who enjoy a bet and a cup of tea. Every closed store leaves a void in their community,” Done wrote in The Sunday Times.

Other operators in a similar situation

Betfred's warning coincides with a wave of cuts among UK operators affected by the increase in remote gaming duty and the prospect of more taxes. Entain announced a reduction of 400 jobs in its customer service area; its CEO, Stella David, pointed out that higher tax burdens would push users towards unregulated markets. Bet365 will cut 340 positions—mainly at its Stoke-on-Trent headquarters—and both Flutter Entertainment and evoke are planning further layoffs and closures of physical units.

Regulatory and competitive risks under new taxes

The discussion surrounding the future of the retail betting channel in the UK is framed within regulatory debates that affect both traditional and digital operators, with consequences on the market and the regulation of the sector. The fiscal debate encompasses the sustainability of business models and the role of physical stores as spaces for socialization and responsible consumption, in contrast to online gambling and illegal channels.

The Betfred case illustrates how taxation policies can redefine the presence and impact of major operators on employment, revenue, and the national sports calendar.

Frequently Asked Questions

¿Cuántas tiendas planea cerrar Betfred si aumenta el MGD?

Betfred advierte que cerraría 495 tiendas, equivalentes al 45% de su red física, si el impuesto Machine Games Duty sube al 40%, además de las 132 ya anunciadas.

¿Qué empleos y patrocinios están en riesgo tras la advertencia?

El potencial cierre afectaría 2.575 empleos y pondría en peligro el patrocinio de Betfred a las cinco carreras clásicas británicas.

¿Cuál sería el impacto fiscal del cierre de tiendas Betfred?

La empresa calcula que el Estado perdería aproximadamente £67 millones anuales en recaudación fiscal tras reducirse la red de tiendas presenciales.

¿Qué otras empresas del sector apuestan por recortes similares?

Entain ha dicho que eliminará 400 empleos, Bet365 recortará 340 principalmente en su sede central, y Flutter como evoke anuncian cierres de unidades físicas y más despidos por el impacto fiscal.

¿Qué razones da Betfred para rechazar el aumento de MGD?

Fred Done argumenta que los clientes son trabajadores, no grandes apostadores, y que los cierres afectan la vida comunitaria y la financiación de las carreras, mientras el alza fiscal favorecería el mercado ilegal.

Source: EGR Awards

Tags

betfredmgdsector-apuestas-ukimpuestos-juegoempleo-apuestaspatrocinio-deportes

About the author

Gonzalo Marín

Gonzalo Marín

Industry Deals Correspondent

Gonzalo Marín covers the corporate deal flow of gambling — operator strategy, M&A, regulated-market entries, and product launches. The reports open with the transaction, cite companies, valuations, and jurisdictions exactly as released, and keep the announcement apart from its actual effect. When a Latin American operator raises capital or a European brand lands in the region, Gonzalo Marín reports who signs, for how much, and on what terms.

More from Gonzalo Marín

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.