Gamdom suffers breach and loses more than $3M after transfers across five blockchains
Transfers on 13 October forced the platform offline while investigators traced on‑chain movements

Key Takeaways
- On 13 October Gamdom's hot wallets moved more than $2.3 million across five blockchains in approximately one hour.
- Gamdom's three Ethereum wallets transferred about $1.2 million that was converted to DAI, and another wallet received $870,000 in DAI via the Relay bridge.
- At least four of the five recipient addresses were previously unused, according to on‑chain tracing.
- Gamdom detected an unauthorized connection tied to a possible disk failure, took systems offline, and reported user data were safe.
- Owner Felix Romer confirmed losses of more than $3 million and the company said it planned to resume operations within hours.
Gamdom confirmed a security breach that caused losses exceeding $3 million and forced the gaming platform to go temporarily offline. The incident concentrated on 13 October when Gamdom's hot wallets on Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron and the XRP Ledger executed suspicious transfers exceeding $2.3 million to five addresses in roughly one hour.
## Gamdom security breach: what happened on 13 October
On 13 October Gamdom's three Ethereum hot wallets moved about $1.2 million to an address that immediately converted balances in USDT and USDC to DAI. Another Ethereum wallet received $870,000 in DAI, largely via the Relay bridge. Together, in a later phase two of the addresses held roughly $1.8 million in DAI and 87 ether.
The transfers totalling more than $2.3 million originated from active hot wallets across five chains: Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron and the XRP Ledger. At least four of the receiving addresses had not been used previously, according to transaction tracing. A small ether movement linked back to an old Gamdom wallet, and one recipient address received approximately $10,000 in BUSD, likely the next operation tied to BNB Chain activity.
## How the transfers affected operations
On‑chain activity forced Gamdom to take services offline shortly after the outflows. Initially the company posted on X that it would return shortly, but did not immediately explain the full nature of the outage. On 14 October Gamdom reported it had detected an unauthorized connection to one of its servers following a possible disk failure; as a result it took systems offline and said user data remained safe.
Owner Felix Romer later confirmed the incident resulted in losses of more than $3 million. Gamdom said the platform would resume activity within hours, without specifying in that statement the exact technical steps or recovery measures to be applied before reopening.
## Technical analysis of the on‑chain asset movements
The transaction pattern shows two clear dynamics: rapid conversions between stablecoins and use of bridges to move liquidity across chains. On Ethereum there were conversions from USDT and USDC to DAI immediately after receiving funds; part of the flow arrived via the Relay bridge, which facilitated moving assets to the address that accumulated DAI.
Records also show activity on BNB Chain and a receipt in BUSD for an amount near $10,000, suggesting attackers used multiple routes and protocols to fragment funds. At least four recipient addresses were brand new, complicating initial traceability and indicating the creation of new addresses to launder or consolidate funds.
## Operational impact and Gamdom's public messages
Gamdom issued direct public communications within 24–48 hours. The operator said personal user information remained secure after the technical intervention and that it had detected an unauthorized connection linked to a possible disk failure on one of its servers. The company's message prioritized containment and data integrity but did not provide a public breakdown of technical remediations or fund recovery routes.
The shutdown and the promise to return in "a few hours" indicate an attempt to restore services quickly while investigators determined the exact scale of the economic diversion. Owner Felix Romer confirmed total losses above $3 million, a figure that includes the movements traced across the five chains cited.
## What operators and vendors should consider after this breach
The attack sequence highlights exposure from multichain hot wallets and the need for stricter controls on server access and key management. For infrastructure providers and platforms, points of attention include:
segregation and hardening of access to servers that manage hot wallets;
real‑time monitoring of outbound flows across multiple chains;
contingency procedures that include orderly disconnection and user communications.
For operators integrating liquidity across blockchains, the incident underlines the importance of on‑chain forensic audits and contingency plans that contemplate migration or freezing of assets when atypical movement is detected.
## Condensed timeline
13 October: hot wallets on Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron and the XRP Ledger transfer more than $2.3 million to five addresses in ~1 hour.
Immediate: multiple conversions from USDT/USDC to DAI and use of the Relay bridge; at least four recipient addresses were new.
Shortly after: Gamdom disconnects the platform and posts a message on X announcing a temporary outage.
14 October: Gamdom reports an unauthorized connection linked to a possible disk failure; confirms user data are secure.
Subsequent: Felix Romer confirms losses over $3 million and the intention to resume operations within hours.
For readers interested in product operation and user experience, Gamdom is a gaming platform that uses multiple blockchains to manage assets and payments; how it restores services and recovers or preserves forensic evidence will determine medium‑term impact on users and vendors.
The platform and infrastructure integrators will need to review procedures and contracts with custodians and security teams. Coverage of the incident will be relevant to the operator and vendor community in our sections of news [news](/news) and for technology partners in b2b [b2b](/b2b).
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did Gamdom lose in the security breach?
Gamdom confirmed losses of more than $3 million. Owner Felix Romer stated the total losses exceed that figure following the detected transfers.
On which blockchains did the suspicious transfers occur?
The transfers originated from hot wallets on Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron and the XRP Ledger. Tracing indicates movements on those five chains on 13 October.
What types of assets were converted after the transfers?
After the outflows there were conversions from USDT and USDC to DAI on Ethereum; additionally, about $10,000 in BUSD was received in connection with BNB Chain activity.
How did Gamdom respond after detecting the incident?
Gamdom disconnected its systems, reported that user data were secure, and said an unauthorized connection affected a server after a possible disk failure; it later announced its intention to resume operations within hours.
What tactics did attackers use according to on‑chain tracing?
The pattern shows multiple routes: rapid stablecoin conversions, use of the Relay bridge to move liquidity between chains, and creation of new recipient addresses—at least four were new—to fragment funds.
Tags
About the author

Gonzalo Marín
Industry Deals Correspondent
Gonzalo Marín covers the corporate deal flow of gambling — operator strategy, M&A, regulated-market entries, and product launches. The reports open with the transaction, cite companies, valuations, and jurisdictions exactly as released, and keep the announcement apart from its actual effect. When a Latin American operator raises capital or a European brand lands in the region, Gonzalo Marín reports who signs, for how much, and on what terms.
More from Gonzalo Marín








