Federal Court of Brazil Upholds Interim Measure Against Spribe in Aviator Studio Case

The Federal Court of Brazil has upheld the prior interim measure providing protection to Aviator Studio in its litigation against Spribe, after denying the clarification motion filed by the latter party. The decision, formalized on Thursday, September 3, 2026, states that Spribe's attempt to amend the original decision does not alter its effects or the validity of the interim protection in favor of Aviator Studio.

Current Status of the Litigation: Judicial Confirmation of the Interim Measure

The case remains ongoing within the Brazilian federal jurisdiction. Judge Arthur Pinheiro Chaves, responsible for the ruling, noted that for Spribe to adequately challenge the basis of the previous decision, it must resort to the appropriate legal procedural route. According to the judicial clarification, if Spribe opts to contest the ruling, it has the option to file an Interlocutory Appeal before the Brazilian Federal Court of Appeals.

Spribe's Motion and Justification of the Federal Ruling

The Clarification Motion was filed by Spribe in response to the interim measure previously obtained by Aviator Studio. According to the case summary released by Aviator Studio, the company submitted its response on August 14, 2026. In its most recent determination, the court confirmed that Spribe's motion did not affect the content or the validity of the provisional measure that protects Aviator Studio and its environment.

“The motion does not change the original decision or the effects of the interim measure,” declared the court under the signature of Judge Arthur Pinheiro Chaves.

The ruling outlines the precise procedural path for challenging the matter's substance, distinguishing between clarification mechanisms and substantive appeals within the Brazilian federal judicial system.

Implications for the Parties and Intellectual Property Rights

Aviator Studio publicly maintains its intentions to defend its key asset, the Aviator brand, against what it considers a violation of its intellectual property rights. In a recent communication, Aviator Studio stated its “commitment to protecting its intellectual property rights and the integrity of the Aviator brand.” The company indicated it will report on upcoming legal actions as the process advances.

In light of the confirmation of the interim measure, Spribe retains the option to activate additional procedural resources within the existing legal framework. The dispute between both companies is situated within the context of protecting copyright and trademark rights in the iGaming industry and the software development for gambling games.

Legal Context and Precedents in the Brazilian iGaming Sector

The litigation between Aviator Studio and Spribe highlights the relevance of precautionary measures in the Brazilian regulatory environment, especially for technology companies and game development studios seeking to protect their innovations. The actions of the federal judiciary fall within the strict approach of Brazilian courts regarding regulation and intellectual property within the sector.

Precautionary measures, such as the one applied in this case, are often employed in disputes where rights and intangible assets may be compromised before a final ruling. In this scenario, adherence to procedures and thorough documentation are essential for presenting appeals and effectively defending the interests of each party.

Next Steps and Communication from the Parties

The main process remains open and pending further judicial pronouncements. Aviator Studio announced it will continue to inform the public and stakeholders about the evolution of the case. Meanwhile, Spribe retains the option to appeal to higher instances of the Brazilian federal system through the procedural figures enabled in the civil procedural code. Neither the date of final resolution nor other substantive details have been confirmed by the court as of the publication date.