CMA launches investigation into mandatory fees of Red Driving School
The Competition and Markets Authority of the United Kingdom evaluates whether Red Driving School adequately reported on mandatory fees in the total price shown to consumers during the purchasing process.

Key Takeaways
- La CMA abrió una investigación formal a Red Driving School el 18 de agosto de 2026.
- El caso evalúa la inclusión de tarifas obligatorias en el precio mostrado al consumidor al inicio de la compra.
- La compañía no ha sido encontrada culpable de infracciones; la investigación está en fase inicial.
- El caso se enmarca en una revisión más amplia de prácticas de drip pricing en el Reino Unido.
The Competition and Markets Authority of the United Kingdom (CMA) opened a formal investigation against RDS Driving Services Limited, known as Red Driving School, on August 18, 2026. The aim is to determine if the company is complying with consumer protection legislation, specifically regarding the clarity and presentation of mandatory fees in its prices. So far, it has not been concluded that Red Driving School has committed any infringement, and the investigation is in the initial phase of gathering information and evidence.
Start of the investigation and reasons
The CMA initiated the process in August 2026 after receiving concerns regarding how Red Driving School, through its trading name, presents mandatory fees to its customers. The focus is on whether these fees are part of the total price the consumer sees at the beginning of the purchasing process. This practice, known as 'drip pricing', is under regulatory scrutiny in various sectors of the United Kingdom, including training and other services throughout 2026.
Fred Houwen, Project Director of Consumer Protection at the CMA, leads the case alongside Sorcha O’Carroll as the Principal Officer. The investigation includes detailed collection of relevant information and evidence to determine if there has been any violation of the applicable legal framework.
Scope and methodology of the CMA in consumer protection cases
In this procedure, the CMA employs the powers established in Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002. The process involves:
- Formal request for relevant information and evidence from Red Driving School
- Assessment of transparency in the presentation of prices and mandatory fees
- Review of how information is accessible to consumers during the purchasing process
- Consideration of compliance with the Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
The CMA emphasizes that, at this stage, the investigation is preliminary and it should not be assumed that there is an infringement.
Drip pricing: context and background in the United Kingdom
The case of Red Driving School is part of a broader review by the CMA regarding possible 'drip pricing' practices in relevant sectors. On the same day, August 18, 2026, the CMA announced that it is also investigating companies like Trainline and Virgin Atlantic concerning the inclusion of extra fees and the clarity offered to consumers from the start of the purchasing process.
“The aim is to ensure that consumers can make informed decisions and fairly compare offers,” stated the CMA in its announcement on August 18.
These investigations respond to concerns that consumers face unexpected charges or incomplete information when finalizing a service purchase.
Timeline and next steps of the CMA's investigation
The CMA expects to gather information and evidence between August 2026 and January 2027. An official update on the case is anticipated for January 2027. During the process, the authority will maintain communication with Red Driving School, and no definitive decisions will be made until the evidence analysis is complete.
Compliance with data protection during the investigation is regulated according to the Enterprise Act 2002 and the current privacy legislation. The personal data collected is part of the dossier and is managed according to the CMA's Personal Information Charter.
Regulatory considerations and repercussions for the services sector
The detailed scrutiny concerning the presentation of mandatory fees highlights a regulatory trend favoring transparency in pricing in the United Kingdom. Operators in training and other areas—even from the payments or events sectors—are closely watching the CMA’s actions for possible regulatory extensions. RDS Driving Services Limited's cooperation with the authorities and the outcome of this case could influence business practices in other sectors.
Validity and public communications
The case of Red Driving School was made public on August 19, 2026, by the CMA. General queries from consumers or third parties can be directed to the official contact of the authority, as indicated in its announcement. No conclusive decisions are expected until at least January 2027, while the evidence gathering and dialogue with the company continue.
Frequently Asked Questions
¿Por qué la CMA investiga a Red Driving School?
La CMA evalúa si Red Driving School presenta las tarifas obligatorias de forma transparente en el precio que ve el consumidor al inicio del proceso de compra, ante posibles prácticas de drip pricing observadas en el sector.
¿Significa esto que Red Driving School ha infringido la ley?
Actualmente no se ha demostrado ninguna infracción por parte de Red Driving School; la CMA se encuentra en una fase inicial de investigación y no ha emitido conclusiones definitivas.
¿Cuándo se conocerán los próximos pasos o una resolución en la investigación?
La CMA prevé dar una actualización sobre el caso en enero de 2027, tras completar la recopilación de información y evidencias entre agosto de 2026 y esa fecha.
¿Qué otras empresas están siendo investigadas por drip pricing en 2026?
El mismo 18 de agosto de 2026, la CMA anunció investigaciones similares a Trainline y Virgin Atlantic, como parte de la revisión de transparencia en la presentación de tarifas a consumidores.
Tags
About the author

Miguel Sandoval
Regulatory Affairs Correspondent
Miguel Sandoval tracks gambling legislation, licensing, and regulator enforcement — from Spain's DGOJ and the Latin American authorities to the UKGC, the MGA, and the state-by-state map in North America. The reports answer three questions precisely — what changed, where, and who it affects — with jurisdictions, dates, and penalties cited exactly as published. Operators and compliance officers read Miguel Sandoval to know which rulebook moved before their next meeting.
More from Miguel Sandoval








