Gambling Commission launches Illegal Gambling Index after first survey data
First wave shows low overall engagement but 4% among online players

Key Takeaways
- The Gambling Commission launched the Illegal Gambling Index based on seven behavioural indicators.
- The Gambling Survey for Great Britain found 1% of respondents used illegal sites in the prior 12 months.
- Among those who gambled online, 4% engaged with unauthorised sites and 2.5% used them in the four weeks before the survey.
- The final sample included 14,257 respondents and 3,569 online players; 128 were classified as users of illegal sites.
- The Commission plans to add questions in 2027 to distinguish four user profiles: Self-Excluders, Skilled Advocates, Social Explorers and Accidental Tourists.
The Gambling Commission has launched a new Illegal Gambling Index that combines seven behavioural indicators to measure consumer interaction with unauthorised gambling sites; the first wave of the Gambling Survey for Great Britain shows that 1% of respondents exhibited some engagement with illegal sites in the previous 12 months. Among those who gambled online in that period, the share rises to 4%, and about 2.5% of online players reported using an illegal site in the four weeks before the survey.
Design and purpose of the Index
The Illegal Gambling Index identifies potentially illegal activity through seven behaviours that the Gambling Commission associates with a higher likelihood of using unauthorised operators. Those behaviours include betting on sites not registered with Gamstop, opening accounts without age or identity checks, cancelling withdrawals before funds reach a bank account or digital wallet, and using virtual private networks (VPNs) to access gambling services not available in Great Britain.
The tool was developed by the Gambling Commission through a multi‑phase research programme that included consumer surveys, interviews, focus groups, expert input and advice from specialist Commission panels. The intention is for the Index to complement the data from the Gambling Survey for Great Britain to track trends in the illegal market and inform regulatory and consumer protection work.
"Understanding the consumer characteristics of illegal online gambling has been no easy task... Simply asking consumers whether they have used an illegal gambling website will not provide a reliable picture," wrote Rupam Jagota, Research and Impact Manager at the Gambling Commission.
Jagota explained on the Commission blog that direct measurement fails because it depends on consumers correctly identifying an illegal site and being willing to report their behaviour. The Index was designed to address those limitations and to be adaptable as the market evolves.
Gambling Survey for Great Britain data
The first series of data from the Gambling Survey for Great Britain covered four quarterly waves between April 2025 and April 2026. The study included 14,257 respondents, of whom 3,569 had gambled online in the previous year.
The main figures published by the Commission are:
1% of respondents showed engagement with an illegal gambling site in the previous 12 months.
4% among those who gambled online in the same period.
2.5% of adults who gambled online in the prior year used an illegal site in the four weeks before the survey.
1.5% reported use at some point in the 12 months but not in the four weeks prior.
Among the total adult population, including non‑players, the comparable percentages were 0.6% and 0.4%.
According to the Gambling Commission, 94.4% of respondents showed no indicators of use of illegal sites, and 4.6% presented some associated signs without sufficient evidence to classify them as users.
Among the 128 respondents ultimately classified as users of illegal sites, 58% said they had knowingly used a site that was not registered with Gamstop, 56.6% reported cancelling a withdrawal before funds reached a bank account or digital wallet, and almost 47% said they registered on a site knowing it would not require age or identity checks. The Commission reminds that licensed operators in Great Britain have been prohibited from allowing withdrawal reversals since 2021.
Sample size, limitations and regulator response
The Commission acknowledges that the final sample size of illegal users is small — 128 people — and that this limits the robustness of some estimates. Sue Young, executive director for operations at the Gambling Commission, said the findings will help to understand a segment of consumers with elevated risks.
"While engagement with the illegal market from an overall population perspective appears low and stable from these indicators, there is a cohort of online gamblers who use these sites and research suggests those consumers who use illegal operators are more likely to experience harm," said Sue Young.
The Commission noted that the Index and the survey allow isolation of a target subgroup for future research and targeted action.
Research and collaboration plans for 2027
The Gambling Commission plans to add new questions to the survey in 2027 to better understand four user profiles identified in prior research: Self-Excluders, Skilled Advocates, Social Explorers and Accidental Tourists. The aim is to distinguish behaviours and motivations within the universe of potential users of unauthorised sites.
The Commission also indicated it will continue to collaborate with the UK government, gambling operators, technology providers and financial institutions to disrupt illegal activity and address the payment and advertising systems that support it. The UK government has already created an illegal gambling taskforce focused on unauthorised online operators and the payment and advertising infrastructures that support them.
Frequently asked questions and next steps
The Gambling Commission will use the Illegal Gambling Index as an adaptable measure; the tool can be updated as more evidence on the illegal market is obtained. The Commission will combine these findings with regulatory efforts and multi‑sector collaboration to reduce availability and the potential harm associated with unauthorised operators.
The additional research and survey changes scheduled for 2027 should provide greater precision on user profiles and on the true prevalence of illegal use within specific sub‑samples of online players. For tracking the regulatory framework and changes to the survey, consult coverage of regulation and the Gambling Commission’s reports on its official channels.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Gambling Commission’s Illegal Gambling Index measure?
The Illegal Gambling Index measures consumer interaction with unauthorised gambling sites using seven behavioural indicators. It combines behaviours such as use of sites not registered with Gamstop, opening accounts without identity checks, cancelling withdrawals before funds are paid, and using VPNs to access services not available in Great Britain.
What are the headline figures from the Gambling Survey for Great Britain on illegal use?
The first survey series, between April 2025 and April 2026, shows 1% of respondents used an illegal site in the prior 12 months and 4% among those who gambled online. The sample included 14,257 respondents and 3,569 online players.
How many respondents were classified as users of illegal sites?
A total of 128 respondents were classified as users of illegal sites. Among them, 58% said they knowingly used a site not registered with Gamstop and 56.6% reported cancelling a withdrawal before funds reached a bank account or digital wallet.
What are the Commission’s research plans for 2027?
The Gambling Commission will add supplementary questions to the survey in 2027 to better understand four previously identified user profiles: Self-Excluders, Skilled Advocates, Social Explorers and Accidental Tourists. The goal is to refine measurement and distinguish behaviour within subgroups of online players.
Tags
About the author

Miguel Sandoval
Regulatory Affairs Correspondent
Miguel Sandoval tracks gambling legislation, licensing, and regulator enforcement — from Spain's DGOJ and the Latin American authorities to the UKGC, the MGA, and the state-by-state map in North America. The reports answer three questions precisely — what changed, where, and who it affects — with jurisdictions, dates, and penalties cited exactly as published. Operators and compliance officers read Miguel Sandoval to know which rulebook moved before their next meeting.
More from Miguel Sandoval








