iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Regulation

PAGCOR Awaits GCG Decision on Separation of Regulatory and Commercial Functions

Alejandro H. Tengco, president of PAGCOR, announces that the GCG could soon decide on the proposal to separate the regulatory and commercial functions of the state gaming agency in the Philippines.

By Miguel SandovalPublished Sep 18, 20263 min readAsia Pacific
Vista panorámica de PAGCOR y Casino Filipino, símbolo del sector regulado del juego en Filipinas.

Key Takeaways

  • PAGCOR espera una pronta decisión de la GCG sobre separar sus funciones regulatorias y comerciales.
  • La propuesta requiere aprobación de la GCG y eventual Orden Ejecutiva presidencial.
  • Alejandro H. Tengco considera que la desvinculación fortalecerá a PAGCOR como regulador.
  • El cambio responde al crecimiento del sector privado y a la evolución del juego electrónico.
  • La industria filipina sigue de cerca el proceso y sus implicancias regulatorias.

The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) has communicated that it expects an imminent resolution from the Governance Commission for Government-Owned or-Controlled Corporations (GCG) regarding its proposal to separate the regulatory and commercial functions of the agency. This was stated by PAGCOR's president and CEO, Alejandro H. Tengco, on Tuesday, September 15, during his speech at the IAG Academy Summit 2026 at Newport World Resorts Manila. This separation would represent a significant institutional reform for the gaming industry in the Philippines, with far-reaching legal, financial, and operational implications.

Current Status of the Proposal and Regulatory Process

Currently, the plan for separation remains under review by the GCG. PAGCOR officials are hopeful that a decision will be announced soon. Once this analysis is completed, the GCG will formally forward the proposal to the President's Office for evaluation. If deemed appropriate, the President may issue an Executive Order establishing the separation of PAGCOR's regulatory and commercial functions. Tengco emphasized that this is a careful and deliberate process: each stage must be thoroughly evaluated to ensure proper implementation.

Implications of Separating PAGCOR’s Functions

The initiative entails extensive reforms for PAGCOR, covering legal, financial, operational, and human resources areas. Tengco stated that such a transformation would allow the institution to focus its resources and teams on regulation, which would strengthen its position within the Philippine sector. The PAGCOR president summarized this approach as follows:

“This is not about how much we are going to generate. It is about strengthening PAGCOR, and with that strength, we will be able to do our job better.” — Alejandro H. Tengco, PAGCOR

According to the executive, one of the main arguments in favor of the reform is to eliminate the inherent conflict of having the same entity regulating and operating within the same market. Tengco asserted:

“A regulator should not oversee its own operations.” — Alejandro H. Tengco, PAGCOR

This principle adheres to international governance standards and seeks to enhance legitimacy and transparency in the local industry.

Evolution of the Gaming Sector in the Philippines and PAGCOR's Role

Since the establishment of Casino Filipino, the Philippine gaming ecosystem has undergone significant changes, driven by the entry of private operators and the rise of electronic gaming. These developments, Tengco noted, require institutions like PAGCOR to adapt rapidly, maintaining competitiveness and adjusting their roles within the industry. The ecosystem, according to the president, is experiencing unprecedented transformation, especially in the Electronic Gaming segment. Institutional response will be key to accompany this sector's dynamism.

Reevaluation of PAGCOR's Commercial Role

In light of the proliferation of licenses granted to the private sector, PAGCOR has begun planning a transition where its commercial function is subordinated to regulatory oversight. This involves preparing internal structures, training staff, and modifying supervision procedures, focusing on a model where regulation is the priority function.

Expectations and Next Steps in the Process

The GCG's resolution — and subsequently the decision of the President of the Philippines — will be pivotal for implementing the proposed institutional modification. Tengco considers that the separation of functions represents a vital step toward building a more focused and robust gaming regulator. Effective implementation will depend on specific legal instruments and executive directives, as well as on internal change management within the organization.

The community of operators, investors, and suppliers in the Philippine sector is closely watching the outcome of this process, as its approval could alter market structure and influence issues of competition, regulatory controls, and relationships with licensees, as seen in recent forums and meetings on regulation, casino, and b2b.

Frequently Asked Questions

¿Cuál es la propuesta presentada por PAGCOR a la GCG?

La propuesta busca separar las funciones regulatorias y comerciales de PAGCOR. El objetivo es que el organismo pueda enfocarse exclusivamente en su rol de regulador del juego en Filipinas, eliminando posibles conflictos de intereses.

¿Qué pasos faltan para implementar la separación de funciones en PAGCOR?

Tras la revisión de la GCG, la propuesta será evaluada por la Oficina del Presidente de Filipinas. Si es aprobada, se emitirá una Orden Ejecutiva para formalizar la separación de funciones en PAGCOR.

¿Por qué se considera necesaria la desvinculación de funciones en PAGCOR?

Se considera necesaria para resolver el conflicto de intereses inherente a que un regulador administre operaciones comerciales bajo su propia supervisión, como remarcó Alejandro H. Tengco durante la IAG Academy Summit 2026.

¿Cómo ha cambiado el sector del juego en Filipinas desde la creación de Casino Filipino?

La industria ha evolucionado con la aparición de operadores privados y el crecimiento del gaming electrónico, lo que ha impulsado a PAGCOR a replantear su función comercial en favor de una mayor regulación.

¿Qué impacto legal y operativo tendría la separación de funciones en PAGCOR?

La separación implicaría cambios legales, financieros, operativos y de recursos humanos para PAGCOR, obligando a la entidad a prepararse en todos los ámbitos para una transición paulatina y controlada.

Tags

PAGCORregulaciónfilipinasgobiernooperadores-de-juego

About the author

Miguel Sandoval

Miguel Sandoval

Regulatory Affairs Correspondent

Miguel Sandoval tracks gambling legislation, licensing, and regulator enforcement — from Spain's DGOJ and the Latin American authorities to the UKGC, the MGA, and the state-by-state map in North America. The reports answer three questions precisely — what changed, where, and who it affects — with jurisdictions, dates, and penalties cited exactly as published. Operators and compliance officers read Miguel Sandoval to know which rulebook moved before their next meeting.

More from Miguel Sandoval

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.