iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Licensing

Stad Brussel cancels award of Brussels Casino three months before concession expires

The July 17 decision in favor of E.C.K. was withdrawn after the suspension by the Council of State.

By Miguel SandovalPublished Oct 1, 20265 min readEurope
Fachada del Casino de Bruselas con personal y logotipos de los operadores implicados en segundo plano

Key Takeaways

  • La Stad Brussel withdrew on September 21, 2026, the award of July 17, 2026, to E.C.K. following the suspension by the Council of State.
  • The suspension was issued by the administrative jurisdiction on August 31, 2026, in arrest no. 267.514 at the request of Casinos Austria International Belgium (Viage).
  • The 15-year concession was valued at €750,000,000 excluding VAT and the current contract expires on January 1, 2027.
  • Stad requested on September 14 that candidates confirm the validity of their bids until February 3, 2027.
  • The situation directly affects 286 employees and could require a temporary extension or a new procedure.

La Stad Brussel withdrew the award of the Casino van Brussel made on July 17, 2026, in favor of E.C.K., the company behind Napoleon Games, after the award was suspended by the administrative jurisdiction. The measure was announced at the municipal assembly on September 21, 2026, leaving the future operator unappointed with just three months remaining until the expiration of the current concession on January 1, 2027.

What happened and why was the decision annulled?

The award to E.C.K. on July 17, 2026, had been subject to an appeal lodged by Casinos Austria International Belgium, the current operator exploiting the establishment under the Viage brand. The administrative section suspended the award in an order dated August 31, 2026, identified as arrest no. 267.514. Following that suspension, Stad Brussel communicated on September 21 that it was withdrawing its decision from July 17 and nullifying it.

The Council of State identified deficiencies in the reasoning behind the evaluation of the offers, in the assessment of certain partnerships proposed by the selected candidate, and in the compliance with obligations related to the European regulation on foreign subsidies. These observations prevented the city from reissuing an immediate award without remedying the legal points indicated.

Consequences for the schedule and operational continuity

The main risk now is practical: the current concession by Viage expires on January 1, 2027. Without a valid award or a temporary agreement with the current concessionaire, the casino could operate without an operator on that date. Stad Brussel needs to decide whether it can correct the processing of the file in time or if it is necessary to restart the procedure.

A six-month temporary extension was discussed during a meeting with staff representatives following their demonstration on September 15, but Viage rejected that extension. In a letter addressed to the Stad and the Brussels regional government, Viage indicated that it does not wish to extend its operations beyond December 31, 2026, with a mere extension of the current concession and instead requested a new reopening and evaluation of the bids following the ruling of the Council of State.

Status of the bids and deadline requested from candidates

According to information reported by Le Soir, Stad Brussel sent a communication to bidders on September 14, 2026, asking them to confirm within ten business days that their proposals would remain valid until February 3, 2027. This confirmation aims to preserve the possibility of continuing to work on the bids already submitted and to prevent their expiration from becoming an administrative obstacle during the analysis of the consequences of the judicial ruling.

Initially, six candidates submitted bids for the 15-year concession: Chaudfontaine Loisirs, E.C.K., Grand Casino de Dinant, Casinos Austria International Belgium, Circus Casino Bruxelles, and Golden Palace Grand Casino Brussels. The bid from Golden Palace was subsequently excluded due to what were considered substantial irregularities in the procedure.

Economic and labor implications of the case

The Stad had estimated the concession at €750,000,000 excluding VAT over fifteen years. This amount underscores the financial importance of the case and explains why compliance with legal obligations, including European ones, has become central to the review. The immediate future of the casino directly affects 286 employees, who have demanded greater clarity regarding their working conditions and continuity.

Possible avenues being considered by Stad Brussel

The municipal administration must now define which procedures can be resumed in the opened file and which elements need to be completed before making a new decision. Among the options are:

  1. Correcting and continuing the current procedure by remedying the deficiencies indicated by the Council of State.

  2. Opening a new award process from scratch, with revised deadlines and requirements.

  3. Reaching a transitional agreement with Viage to ensure operational continuity, provided both parties agree.

Nawal Ben Hamou stated in the municipal assembly on September 21 that Stad is still considering the possibility of dialoguing with the current operator to find a solution that guarantees the continuity of the casino.

“The city remains open to dialogue with the current operator to ensure the continuity of operations,” said Nawal Ben Hamou during the municipal session.

Any extension can only be formalized if Stad and Viage reach an agreement; Viage has already expressed its rejection of a mere extension without a new evaluation of the bids.

Political dimension and upcoming milestones

The case also carries a political weight, impacting the figure of Mayor Philippe Close, although there is currently no legal finding of a conflict of interest according to available information. Stad now has several weeks to decide how to act before January 1, 2027, a critical date on the calendar.

The immediate steps that will dictate the pace of the case are receiving confirmations of offer validity until February 3, 2027, determining the elements that Stad must complete to comply with the ruling of the Council of State, and negotiating with Viage for a temporary solution. The resolution of these milestones will determine whether Napoleon Games (E.C.K.), Viage, or any of the other candidates end up being designated as the new concessionaire.

For regulatory follow-up and market implications, professionals can consult the regulation section and local reports in the news.

Frequently Asked Questions

¿Por qué se anuló la adjudicación del Casino de Bruselas a E.C.K.?

La adjudicación se retiró porque el Consejo de Estado suspendió la decisión tras detectar deficiencias en la motivación de la valoración de ofertas, en la evaluación de alianzas propuestas y en el cumplimiento de obligaciones relacionadas con el Reglamento europeo sobre subvenciones extranjeras. La suspensión administrativa se dictó el 31 de agosto de 2026 en el arresto nº 267.514 a instancia de Casinos Austria International Belgium.

¿Qué fecha es crítica para la continuidad operativa del casino?

El 1 de enero de 2027 es la fecha crítica, ya que ese día expira la concesión vigente explotada por Viage. Sin una adjudicación válida o un acuerdo temporal con el operador actual, el casino podría quedarse sin explotador.

¿Qué pasos pidió la Stad Brussel a los candidatos después de la suspensión judicial?

La Stad Brussel solicitó el 14 de septiembre de 2026 que los candidatos confirmen en un plazo de diez días hábiles que sus propuestas permanecen vigentes hasta el 3 de febrero de 2027, con el fin de conservar la posibilidad de seguir trabajando sobre las ofertas presentadas.

¿Cuáles son las alternativas que estudia la Stad para resolver la situación?

La Stad está evaluando corregir y continuar el procedimiento actual subsanando las deficiencias señaladas, reabrir un nuevo proceso de adjudicación o negociar un acuerdo transitorio con Viage que garantice la continuidad operativa, siempre que ambas partes lo acepten.

¿Cuál es el impacto económico y laboral del expediente del Casino de Bruselas?

La concesión fue estimada en €750.000.000 excluido IVA a lo largo de quince años, y la situación afecta directamente a 286 empleados del casino que reclaman mayor claridad sobre su futuro.

Tags

brussels-casinoconcesionregulaciónviagenapoleon-games

About the author

Miguel Sandoval

Miguel Sandoval

Regulatory Affairs Correspondent

Miguel Sandoval tracks gambling legislation, licensing, and regulator enforcement — from Spain's DGOJ and the Latin American authorities to the UKGC, the MGA, and the state-by-state map in North America. The reports answer three questions precisely — what changed, where, and who it affects — with jurisdictions, dates, and penalties cited exactly as published. Operators and compliance officers read Miguel Sandoval to know which rulebook moved before their next meeting.

More from Miguel Sandoval

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.