iGAMINGHOUSE
Regulation

Denmark’s DFSA Directs Inpay to Halt New Online Gaming Client Deals

Danish Financial Supervisory Authority mandates Inpay A/S suspend new igaming business relationships due to major anti-money laundering compliance breaches.

By Eleanor WhitfieldPublished Aug 18, 20264 min readEurope
DFSA regulatory notice with Denmark flag and online gaming cards, symbolizing payment compliance enforcement

Key Takeaways

  • DFSA has ordered Inpay A/S to stop onboarding new igaming business clients due to serious compliance breaches.
  • Inpay’s deficiencies include failures in customer due diligence and transaction monitoring for high-risk clients.
  • A significant portion of Inpay's transaction volume comes from gaming clients outside Denmark and the EU.
  • Resumption of new igaming business for Inpay depends on DFSA approval once violations are rectified.

The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA) has instructed Inpay A/S to immediately cease entering into new business relationships with online gaming clients. This directive follows the DFSA’s findings of material breaches of Denmark’s Money Laundering Act, with the financial regulator requiring Inpay to demonstrate compliance improvements before resuming such deals.

DFSA’s Order and Its Immediate Impact on Inpay

On 18 August 2026, the DFSA notified Inpay A/S—licensed under the Danish Payments Act—that it must halt the establishment of new online gaming business relationships. This action applies until Inpay can confirm it has rectified what were described as "serious violations" of anti-money laundering regulations. Inpay, headquartered in Denmark, processes cross-border payments on behalf of igaming operators, financial institutions, corporates, and NGOs, but a substantial share of its transaction volume is derived from gaming clients located outside both Denmark and the European Union.

The DFSA intervened after a March 2026 investigation uncovered several violations of the Money Laundering Act. Deficiencies in customer due diligence and transaction monitoring were central to the investigation’s findings.

Money Laundering Act Breaches: Customer Due Diligence Failures

The regulator’s assessment identified specific non-compliance areas:

  • Inpay failed to adhere to required customer due diligence steps, especially in situations where customers' circumstances changed.
  • The company did not sufficiently assess either the purpose or intended nature of its business relationships, particularly regarding high-risk clients exposed to money laundering and terrorist financing.
  • Inpay’s procedures did not account for the complexity of some customer ownership structures, nor for the risks associated with operating in murkier international jurisdictions.

The DFSA stated these failings were aggravated by the type of customers involved, the significant transaction volumes processed and the opaque activities of some third parties. According to the DFSA, these issues “entail a real and significant risk that the company supports illegal gaming activities and the provision of payment services without a permit, which entails a particularly high risk of money laundering and terrorist financing.”

Regulatory Context and DFSA Requirements for Inpay

The regulator emphasised the difference between licensed and illegal gaming providers, noting that unlicensed operators—especially those outside Denmark and the EU—lack rigorous anti-money laundering and consumer protection controls. As a result, financial intermediaries such as Inpay have heightened compliance burdens. The DFSA further noted that continued deficiencies increase the risk profile for both Inpay and its customers.

"Illegal gaming providers are not subject to the same requirements for the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing or consumer protection as licensed providers, which further increases the risk," the DFSA said in its official statement.

The DFSA will permit Inpay to resume onboarding new online gaming business customers only after it verifies that all prior deficiencies have been adequately corrected. There is no specified timeline for this process.

Inpay’s Response and Corporate Profile

Inpay has voluntarily suspended new igaming business client onboarding, pending resolution of the issues raised by the regulator. In communications with the DFSA, the payment provider acknowledged the seriousness of the findings. Founded in 2008 in Denmark, Inpay describes itself as the country’s fastest-growing company and a payments facilitator for sectors including financial institutions, igaming, corporates, and non-profit organisations. According to public disclosures, Inpay processes approximately one million transactions monthly, and 888 Holdings is listed as a customer on the company’s website.

EGR Awards has reached out to Inpay for comment, but no statement has yet been released by the company.

Implications for the Online Gaming Payments Sector

The intervention from Denmark’s financial regulator underscores the continuing importance of compliance for payment providers operating in the igaming sector. Payments firms serving gaming operators—particularly when handling high-risk, cross-border flows—face heightened scrutiny under anti-money laundering frameworks. Companies active in this space must maintain up-to-date customer due diligence, robust transaction monitoring tools, and clear processes for responding to changes in customer circumstances. The DFSA’s action reinforces that regulators across Europe expect proactive measures from payment processors, especially as regulatory frameworks become more stringent.

For further updates on compliance shifts in payments or ongoing enforcement actions within the market, monitor relevant news sections.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the DFSA order Inpay to halt new online gaming deals?

The DFSA issued this order after uncovering major violations of the Money Laundering Act by Inpay, including insufficient customer due diligence and inadequate transaction monitoring for high-risk gaming clients.

What specific compliance failures did Inpay commit according to the DFSA?

Inpay failed to properly review changes in customer circumstances, neglected to assess the nature and purpose of high-risk relationships, and did not sufficiently address complex ownership and activities, making them non-compliant with Danish regulations.

Can Inpay resume onboarding new igaming customers?

Inpay may only resume establishing new igaming business relationships once the DFSA verifies full correction of the identified compliance failures, but no timeline has been provided.

How significant is the online gaming sector within Inpay's business?

A substantial proportion of Inpay's total cross-border transactions originates from online gaming clients outside Denmark and the EU, highlighting the sector's importance in its overall transaction volume.

Source: EGR Awards

Tags

dfsainpaymoney-laundering-actigaming-paymentscompliancedenmark

About the author

Eleanor Whitfield

Eleanor Whitfield

Regulatory Affairs Correspondent

Eleanor Whitfield tracks gambling legislation, licensing decisions, and regulator enforcement across key markets — from the UKGC, MGA, and Germany's GGL to Spain's DGOJ and the state-by-state map in the Americas. The reporting answers three questions precisely: what changed, where, and who it affects, with jurisdictions, effective dates, and penalty figures named exactly as published. Compliance officers and operators read Eleanor Whitfield to know which rulebook moved before their next board meeting.

More from Eleanor Whitfield

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.