Ballys’ Soo Kim backs Star Entertainment after A$260m Federal Court penalty
Chairman affirms solvency, cites 61% controlling stake and Q1 FY27 EBITDA recovery.

Key Takeaways
- The Federal Court ordered a A$260 million penalty for Star Entertainment, payable in four instalments between November 2026 and May 2028.
- AUSTRAC had sought A$400 million; Star accepted the court’s A$260 million penalty.
- Star reported $12 million group EBITDA in Q1 FY27, reversing a $13 million loss from the prior year period.
- Ballys Corporation and Investment Holdings Pty together hold a 61% controlling stake in Star (38% and 23% respectively).
- New South Wales Independent Casino Commission Chief Commissioner Philip Crawford praised material improvements at Star in June.
Ballys Corporation chairman Soo Kim has publicly backed Star Entertainment’s financial recovery after the Federal Court of Australia imposed a A$260 million penalty for historical anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing failings. The penalty, accepted by Star after AUSTRAC initially sought A$400 million, is payable in four instalments between November 2026 and May 2028; Ballys and partner Investment Holdings Pty together hold a 61% controlling stake in Star.
Immediate financial picture
Kim told investors he does not believe the court’s decision will render Star insolvent. Star reported $12 million in group EBITDA for the first quarter of fiscal 2027, reversing a $13 million loss in the same quarter a year earlier. Combined revenue at Star’s Sydney and Gold Coast venues rose 9% versus the fourth quarter of 2026, the first sequential uplift for both locations since quarterly reporting began in September 2024.
“We do not believe the decision renders Star insolvent,” Soo Kim said. “The turnaround is progressing at a good pace. Circumstances at Star today are materially different from when we first became involved.”
Kim reiterated that Ballys’ experience operating casinos in regulated jurisdictions and the commitment of Star’s leadership are supporting the recovery.
Penalty timing and structure
The Federal Court handed down the A$260 million penalty for historical AML/CTF compliance breaches across Star’s Sydney and Queensland properties. The court-ordered payment schedule runs from November 2026 to May 2028 in four instalments. AUSTRAC had sought a larger fine — A$400 million — but Star accepted the court’s smaller penalty and its structured timetable.
Market observers had questioned Star’s liquidity and covenant position after the decision. Star disclosed a review of its credit facility agreement with WhiteHawk Capital Partners; management said it is confident the facility will remain accessible during the remediation and payment period.
Ownership and governance support
Ballys Corporation retains approximately 38% of Star, while Investment Holdings Pty holds 23%, giving the pair a combined 61% majority. Kim framed that controlling interest as a source of strategic and operational support for Star’s turnaround and remediation work.
Kim described the recovery programme as broader than short-term financial fixes, emphasising cultural and control improvements alongside commercial repairs. He said Star’s new leadership team had delivered measurable progress in a short timeframe.
Regulatory engagement and remediation progress
Regulators have continued to enforce supplementary measures while recognising remediation progress. In June, New South Wales Independent Casino Commission Chief Commissioner Philip Crawford publicly praised the “materially significant improvements” implemented under Star’s new leadership, even as the commission and other regulators imposed additional compliance fines and mandated reserves for internal upgrades.
Star accepted the Federal Court decision and confirmed it is implementing remediation measures across culture, controls and operating discipline. Management has described the programme as rebuilding the company “from the inside out.”
What stakeholders will watch next
Stakeholders will be watching four areas in the coming months: the timing and completion of the instalment payments (November 2026–May 2028), continued quarterly trading — including follow-through from the Q1 FY27 $12 million EBITDA result and 9% venue revenue uplift — the outcome of the WhiteHawk Capital Partners facility review, and regulator feedback on implemented controls. Ballys’ 61% combined stake ensures the controlling shareholders will remain central to those developments.
The company statement and financial figures were provided by Ballys Corporation and Star Entertainment following the Federal Court ruling issued on 30 October 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much is the Federal Court penalty against Star Entertainment and when is it payable?
The Federal Court imposed a A$260 million penalty on Star Entertainment, payable in four instalments between November 2026 and May 2028. AUSTRAC had originally sought A$400 million but Star accepted the A$260 million ruling.
What recent trading results did Star report after the penalty ruling?
Star reported $12 million in group EBITDA for the first quarter of fiscal 2027, compared with a $13 million loss in the same quarter the previous year, and a 9% increase in combined Sydney and Gold Coast revenue versus Q4 2026.
Who controls Star Entertainment and what support have they offered?
Ballys Corporation owns approximately 38% of Star and Investment Holdings Pty owns 23%, giving them a combined 61% controlling stake. Ballys chairman Soo Kim said the ownership and Ballys’ casino experience provide strategic and operational support for Star’s turnaround.
Has any regulator acknowledged Star’s remediation work?
Yes. In June, New South Wales Independent Casino Commission Chief Commissioner Philip Crawford praised the materially significant improvements implemented under Star’s new leadership, while regulators continued to enforce additional compliance fines and mandated reserves.
Tags
About the author

Marcus Webb
Industry Deals Correspondent
Marcus Webb covers the deal flow of the gambling industry — operator strategy, M&A, market entries, and product launches from sportsbook rebrands to full platform migrations. The reports name the companies, valuations, and jurisdictions exactly as disclosed and separate the announcement from its market impact. When a group consolidates a brand or a challenger launches into a new state, Marcus Webb explains who gains, who pays, and what closes next quarter.
More from Marcus Webb








