Publicly Listed iGaming Firms Detail Impact of Brazil Online Gambling Ban
Major operators and suppliers, including Allwyn, Entain, Flutter, Better Collective and Kambi, address the projected financial and operational fallout from Brazil's provisional ban effective 6 October 2026.

Key Takeaways
- Brazil's provisional ban on online gambling from 6 October 2026 has prompted major listed operators to update financial guidance and legal plans.
- Allwyn, Entain, Flutter, Better Collective, and Kambi each reported distinct exposures, with Betano and Sportingbet most affected.
- Flutter forecasts a $70m revenue and $20m EBITDA reduction for 2026 if the ban remains.
- Better Collective suspended share buybacks and 2027–2028 forecasts in response to regulatory uncertainty.
- Operators warn the prohibition may drive players toward unregulated offshore sites and reduce tax revenues.
Brazil's provisional measure to ban online gambling from 6 October 2026 has forced leading listed firms, including Allwyn, Entain, Flutter, Better Collective, and Kambi, to report significant anticipated impacts to their business and guidance. Each firm has publicly detailed its exposure, financial risks, and strategic intent in response to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's directive, which will take effect unless overturned by Congress after the October elections.
Allwyn: Assessing Options for Betano's Brazil Operations
Allwyn, quoted on the Athens Stock Exchange, holds a 36.75% stake in Kaizen Gaming’s Betano brand—officially Brazil’s largest operator. Allwyn disclosed that Betano is preparing legal action and evaluating mitigants due to its five-year licence in Brazil. The ban triggers a preliminary revision of Allwyn's previously guided adjusted EBITDA margin (approx. 37%), which 'would no longer be applicable' if the prohibition persists throughout 2026. The actual impact depends on cost-reduction measures and how long the provisional measure remains in force. Allwyn shares fell nearly 3% to €11.38 following the news.
- Betano represents just one segment of Allwyn’s diversified portfolio.
- Equity method means any knock-on will be reflected via share of profit from investees rather than underlying operations.
- Betano will pursue expansion in four other countries in early 2027.
Entain: Full-Year Guidance Adjusted and Cites Unconsulted Legislation
Entain, which owns Sportingbet in Brazil, maintained its full-year group guidance of £910m–£960m EBITDA and a 21%–22% online underlying margin. Still, management now expects to reach the lower end of these ranges due to the ban. After the announcement, Entain's share price dropped over 3% to 435p in London. Brazil accounts for about 5% of Entain's online net gaming revenue (NGR), but the EBITDA contribution from this market has been modest because of prevailing high competition and costs. Updated forecasts:
- Excluding Brazil, Entain targets 5%–7% growth (constant currency).
- Including Brazil, forecasts drop to 4%–6%, assuming the ban lasts through 2026.
Entain publicly lamented the lack of consultation and warned of significant adverse consequences, but said it will continue to monitor developments in regulation and update stakeholders as needed.
Better Collective: Share Price Plummets, Guidance Withdrawn
Better Collective’s shares lost a quarter of their value in Stockholm as the company suspended its share buyback and withdrew 2027-2028 guidance, citing 'current uncertainty'. The Danish affiliate now expects organic revenue growth of 3%–8% (down from 7%–12%) and an EBITDA before special items growth between –7% and +3% (previously 8%–18%). The group's net debt to EBITDA ratio remains below 3x.
- Prior to the ban, Better Collective's Brazilian business projected €45m in revenue for 2026—about 12% of group consensus.
- Of this, €15m was forecast for the rest of 2026, mostly via revenue share with licensed operators.
- Annual cost base in Brazil is roughly €10m.
Co-CEO Jesper Søgaard publicly warned that eliminating regulated operators could drive millions of players to illegal sites, diminishing consumer protections and tax contributions, and unraveling the regulatory ecosystem.
“Removing that regulated market will not eliminate the underlying demand for betting...it risks pushing millions of players toward illicit offshore operators...Our concern is that a measure intended to protect consumers could ultimately dismantle a regulated ecosystem that was specifically created to protect them.” — Jesper Søgaard, Better Collective
Flutter: $70m Revenue Impact, $20m EBITDA Hit If Ban Persists
Flutter, publicly traded in New York and operator of Betfair and Betnacional in Brazil, estimated a $70m fall in 2026 revenue and $20m in adjusted EBITDA reduction if it cannot operate in Brazil for the remainder of the year. The group called the provisional measure a shock, underscoring its full compliance with Brazilian regulation and significant investment—including the $350m acquisition of a majority in NSX Group in 2025. According to Flutter, the sector sustains approximately 15,000 jobs (direct and indirect), with 15 betting firms investing roughly BRL3bn in media advertising in 2025 alone.
Flutter cited LCA Consultores research, based on Instituto Locomotiva data, suggesting a ban would put BRL8bn–73bn in tax revenue at risk from 2027–2030. Their statement also argued that user protection tools—such as KYC, deposit caps, and anti-money laundering controls—would be undermined if punters migrated to unlicensed sites.
“The demand for betting does not cease to exist with the removal of authorised operators. A ban tends to push consumers toward illegal platforms, where mechanisms such as user identification, deposit limits, transaction monitoring, self-exclusion and anti-money laundering prevention are not guaranteed.” — Flutter (corporate statement)
Kambi: Financial Impact “Limited”, Commitment to Compliance
Kambi, major sportsbook supplier for Brazilian-facing firms like Stake and KTO, described the ban as disappointing policy. CEO Werner Becher said Brazil is a 'low single-digit percentage' revenue market for Kambi, so the immediate impact is limited. In a statement, Becher expressed support for a well-regulated market with strong oversight and warned that prohibition would only drive activity to the black market. Kambi will comply fully but notes the measure remains provisional and requires rapid Congressional approval after the October election.
Broader Implications: Regulatory Uncertainty and Market Risks
The Brazilian government’s intervention brings operational confusion for both operators and suppliers. The sector’s employment and tax footprint is substantial, and the immediate financial reactions—share slumps, suspended guidance, halted buybacks—highlight both the scale and velocity of the disruption. While firms with substantial diversification (such as Allwyn and Kambi) indicate contained risk, entities most exposed to Brazil’s fast-growing sector bear greater share-price and earnings volatility.
Legal appeals, cost-reduction strategies, and market exit or entry planning are now being worked through in boardrooms. The final legislative outcome remains uncertain, with both the domestic and international B2B community closely tracking developments.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does Brazil's provisional ban on online gambling take effect?
Brazil's provisional measure banning online gambling is scheduled to take effect on 6 October 2026. The measure remains 'provisional' and will require Congressional approval after the October presidential election.
Which public gaming companies are most affected by the Brazil online gambling ban?
Allwyn, Entain, Flutter, and Better Collective have all reported substantial impacts to their financial forecasts and operations, with Betano (36.75% owned by Allwyn) identified as Brazil’s largest operator and most exposed.
What financial impacts have been disclosed by public companies so far?
Flutter reported a likely reduction of $70m in 2026 revenue and $20m in adjusted EBITDA if unable to operate, while Better Collective slashed revenue guidance and suspended buybacks, and Allwyn warned its 37% EBITDA margin guidance may not apply with the ban in force.
How have companies responded to the sudden regulation change in Brazil?
Companies are preparing legal challenges, cost reductions, and scenario planning. Entain and Better Collective expressed disappointment at the lack of industry consultation, and Kambi reiterated the importance of regulated markets while committing to compliance.
What are the broader market risks from Brazil's online gambling prohibition?
Industry leaders warn the ban could push players to unregulated offshore sites, erode local tax receipts, jeopardise approximately 15,000 jobs, and dismantle consumer-protection frameworks built into the regulated market.
Tags
About the author

Marcus Webb
Industry Deals Correspondent
Marcus Webb covers the deal flow of the gambling industry — operator strategy, M&A, market entries, and product launches from sportsbook rebrands to full platform migrations. The reports name the companies, valuations, and jurisdictions exactly as disclosed and separate the announcement from its market impact. When a group consolidates a brand or a challenger launches into a new state, Marcus Webb explains who gains, who pays, and what closes next quarter.
More from Marcus Webb








