Novig and Crypto.com exchange ask federal courts to block Missouri actions
Firms filed suits on 16 October seeking federal protection from Missouri cease-and-desist letters

Key Takeaways
- Novig (Ludlow Exchange) and North American Derivatives Exchange filed federal suits on 16 October against Attorney General Catherine Hanaway and the Missouri Gaming Commission.
- In September Hanaway’s office sent cease‑and‑desist letters to Robinhood, Underdog, Novig, Crypto.com, Kalshi and Polymarket demanding state licensing.
- Novig says the CFTC designated it a contract market in June and seeks a declaration that Missouri gaming laws are preempted as applied to its contracts.
- Licensed bookmakers in Missouri pay a 10% gross receipts tax and must exclude anyone under 21.
- The KalshiEX v. Bird appeal before the Eighth Circuit has briefing due to conclude on 6 December.
Novig —operating as Ludlow Exchange— and North American Derivatives Exchange, Crypto.com’s derivatives exchange, filed federal lawsuits on Friday 16 October to stop Missouri from treating their event contracts on sports as unlicensed betting. Ludlow Exchange filed a 42‑page complaint in the Eastern District of Missouri naming Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, Missouri Gaming Commission CEO Michael A. Leara and Chair Jan Zimmerman; North American Derivatives Exchange filed a 39‑page suit in the Western District of Missouri naming Hanaway and commission members.
Origin: September cease‑and‑desist letters
In September Attorney General Hanaway’s office sent cease‑and‑desist letters to Robinhood, Underdog, Novig, Crypto.com, Kalshi and Polymarket, ordering them to stop offering event contracts on sports to Missouri residents unless they obtain a license from the Missouri Gaming Commission. Licensed bookmakers in the state pay a 10% tax on gross receipts and must exclude anyone under 21 years of age. Hanaway wrote on X on 18 September: “Companies cannot repackage sports bets as ‘event contracts’ to evade Missouri law.” According to Novig’s complaint, the letter gave it until 17 October to comply; as of Monday close no enforcement action had been announced against either exchange.
Argument of federal preemption
Novig argues that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over swaps traded on a federally designated contract market, and that its event contracts are swaps. The complaint notes that the CFTC designated Novig as such a market in June. Novig seeks a declaration that Missouri’s gaming laws are preempted as applied to its exchange, together with preliminary and permanent injunctive relief; the early injunction request seeks to “preserve the parties’ legal positions pending resolution of a question on which courts are divided.”
North American Derivatives Exchange raises the same constitutional argument in its suit, asserting that Congress conferred “exclusive” jurisdiction on the CFTC over federally designated contract markets. A footnote says the attorney general’s office misdirected the cease‑and‑desist to Foris DAX, Inc., which the document identified as Crypto.com, instead of to North American Derivatives Exchange.
Procedural context
The filings cite the pending Kalshi appeal in KalshiEX v. Bird before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Missouri; the briefing schedule is set to conclude on 6 December. Federal court dockets in Missouri showed no filings by Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood or Underdog as of Monday close.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are Novig and the Crypto.com exchange asking for in their federal suits?
They ask federal courts to declare Missouri gaming laws preempted as applied to their contracts because the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over swaps on designated contract markets; Novig also seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions. Novig’s complaint notes the CFTC designated it in June.
Who received cease‑and‑desist letters from the Missouri attorney general and what did the letters demand?
Attorney General Hanaway’s office sent letters in September to Robinhood, Underdog, Novig, Crypto.com, Kalshi and Polymarket, demanding they stop offering event contracts on sports to Missouri residents unless they obtain a Missouri Gaming Commission licence.
What tax and age rules apply to bookmakers licensed in Missouri?
Licensed bookmakers in Missouri pay a 10% tax on gross receipts and must exclude anyone under 21 years of age.
What procedural timetable do the complaints cite?
The complaints cite the KalshiEX v. Bird appeal before the Eighth Circuit, with briefing scheduled to conclude on 6 December; Novig and North American Derivatives Exchange filed on 16 October.
Tags
About the author

Renata Quiroga
Betting Markets Correspondent
Renata Quiroga covers sports betting and prediction markets — sportsbook launches, odds technology, event contracts, and the regulatory calls that decide what can be bet on and where. The reports open with the product or the ruling, name operators and platforms precisely, and explain the mechanics without needless jargon. When a book enters a Latin American market or a prediction exchange lists a contested contract, Renata Quiroga reports what changes for the bettor.
More from Renata Quiroga








