European Commission research finds system failures enabling illegal gambling ads
Study flags verification gaps on major platforms and mobile distribution risks under the DSA

Key Takeaways
- European Commission‑commissioned research by Open Evidence and Spark Legal identifies verification failures that enable illegal gambling advertising across EU markets.
- The study says advertising featured in 99% of the gambling scam cases reviewed but clarifies this is not a measure of all gambling ads.
- Google implemented new unconditional gambling advertiser certification rules as of 14 September, but country-level certification is still required.
- The Kansspelautoriteit reported more than 4,600 illegal adverts to Meta in April, and the Dutch government recorded over 26,000 reports in May.
- Dutch trade body VNLOK plans legal action and a complaint to the European Commission after finding that 97% of identified ads were from unlicensed operators.
The European Commission commissioned research that identifies system failures on major online platforms enabling illegal gambling advertising to flourish across member states. The study, carried out by Open Evidence and Spark Legal and published as part of the Commission’s supervisory work, highlights gaps in advertiser verification, mobile app distribution and the persistence of fraudulent adverts; it notes the Digital Services Act entered full application in February 2024.
Scope and purpose of the study
The research examined scams across six advertising fields: online gambling, financial services, investment, romance, e-commerce and personal health. Open Evidence and Spark Legal were contracted to uncover vulnerabilities in platform media and to inform development and supervisory activity under the European Commission’s Digital Services Act (DSA) framework. The report says its feedback “examines how scams manifest across designated services, their impact on users and society, and the countermeasures available”. It adds that the research does not assess platform compliance with DSA obligations.
The Commission launched the DSA into full application in February 2024, with a mandate to set harmonised rules for intermediary services in the internal market. The DSA requires large online platforms to show accountability for protecting users from illegal content, protecting minors and vulnerable audiences, and safeguarding user data autonomy.
Verification gaps on gambling advertising
The research documents how ad systems have allowed campaigns to run in jurisdictions where the advertiser holds no valid local gambling licence. It identifies platform liabilities including over-reliance on so-called “suspicious declarations” and weaknesses in confirming that an advertiser is authorised to target a specific member state. The report emphasises that identifying a business and confirming it holds a gambling licence somewhere in Europe does not, by itself, establish permission to serve every EU market.
Google is reported to have introduced new unconditional certification rules for gambling advertisers, implemented as of 14 September; advertisers must still apply for country-level certifications for each market they intend to target. The study concludes interviewees support stronger verification for regulated sectors.
Fraudulent schemes and advertising prevalence
The research describes fraudulent casinos and betting services that entice consumers to deposit money, then prevent withdrawals through manipulated outcomes, frozen accounts or blocked access. It cites Debunk.org reporting that advertising featured in 99% of the gambling scam cases reviewed, while clarifying that the figure should not be interpreted to mean 99% of all gambling advertising is fraudulent.
Mobile distribution is a third major concern. The report references Trend Micro research showing fake apps on Apple’s App Store and Google Play that conceal gambling functionality during review and activate it only after approval, undermining entry-point checks.
Proposed countermeasures in the study include stronger business verification, automated detection supported by human review, improved reporting tools and increased cooperation between platforms and external organisations.
National enforcement and industry pressure in the Netherlands
Dutch enforcement and industry groups provided contemporaneous evidence of the problem. The Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) disclosed it had reported more than 4,600 illegal adverts to Meta during April, and the Dutch government later put the number of reports in May at more than 26,000. The government response warned that the short lifespan and high volume of adverts made case-by-case reporting and removal an insufficiently scalable remedy.
Dutch trade body VNLOK demanded advance verification of gambling advertisers’ licences and better detection of cloaking and referrals via messaging services. VNLOK announced plans for legal proceedings against Meta and a complaint to the European Commission in June.
At the Gaming In Spain conference in Madrid, VNLOK reported evidence it says documents failures by Meta. VNLOK gave a statistic that 97% of all advertisements the group identified were from unlicensed operators.
"This study clearly shows how enormous the fraud and scam challenges are on very large online platforms and search engines," VNLOK said. "These technical juggernauts combine reach, AI and audiences into a mix that is systematically being misused and thus needs more verification and filtering."
Platforms named and next steps
The study names major platforms including Meta, Google and Apple and points to systemic liabilities across their advertising ecosystems. The authors call for stronger business verification tied to the specific jurisdiction targeted by an advert and for improved platform cooperation with external monitors.
The Commission’s research is positioned as input to its supervisory and monitoring activity under the Digital Services Act. The report does not provide a compliance assessment but sets out technical and policy options that regulators and platforms can consider. VNLOK’s legal challenge and national reporting totals from the Ksa are among the enforcement data the Commission will hold alongside the study as it advances oversight.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the European Commission’s research find about illegal gambling ads?
The research found system failures in advertiser verification and mobile distribution that allow illegal gambling advertising to run in markets where operators hold no valid local licence. The study, conducted by Open Evidence and Spark Legal, identifies platform liabilities including over-reliance on suspicious declarations and apps that conceal gambling functions during review.
Does the study say platforms are non-compliant with the Digital Services Act?
No. The report explicitly states it does not assess platform compliance with DSA obligations. It was commissioned to uncover vulnerabilities and inform supervisory work under the DSA, which entered full application in February 2024.
How prevalent were adverts in the scam cases the research reviewed?
The report cites Debunk.org in saying advertising featured in 99% of the gambling scam cases reviewed, while warning this figure should not be taken to mean 99% of all gambling advertising is fraudulent.
What enforcement evidence did Dutch authorities provide?
The Kansspelautoriteit reported more than 4,600 illegal adverts to Meta in April, and the Dutch government recorded over 26,000 reports in May. VNLOK says 97% of ads it identified were from unlicensed operators and has announced legal proceedings and a complaint to the Commission in June.
What countermeasures does the research recommend?
The study recommends stronger business verification tied to targeted jurisdictions, automated detection backed by human review, improved reporting tools and greater cooperation between platforms and external organisations. It also highlights the need to address mobile app cloaking identified in Trend Micro research.
Tags
About the author

Eleanor Whitfield
Regulatory Affairs Correspondent
Eleanor Whitfield tracks gambling legislation, licensing decisions, and regulator enforcement across key markets — from the UKGC, MGA, and Germany's GGL to Spain's DGOJ and the state-by-state map in the Americas. The reporting answers three questions precisely: what changed, where, and who it affects, with jurisdictions, effective dates, and penalty figures named exactly as published. Compliance officers and operators read Eleanor Whitfield to know which rulebook moved before their next board meeting.
More from Eleanor Whitfield








