iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Regulation

The Italian AGCM Opens Consultation on Perplexity AI Clauses: Possible Contractual Abuses

The Italian Competition Authority initiated case PS13123 analyzing clauses in the Terms of Service of Perplexity AI, inviting stakeholders to submit comments within 30 days.

By Miguel SandovalPublished Aug 24, 20265 min readEurope
AGCM consultation table and contractual terms documents under review for the PS13123 procedure of Perplexity AI

Key Takeaways

  • The AGCM initiated the PS13123 consultation on the Terms of Service of Perplexity AI in May 2026.
  • Clauses regarding payments, liability, mandatory arbitration, and account termination are under scrutiny.
  • Associations and consumers can participate by submitting observations within 30 days.
  • The procedure aims to determine whether there is a contractual imbalance against the Consumer Code.
  • The review impacts the provision of artificial intelligence services in Italy.

The Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) has announced the opening of a public consultation regarding various contractual clauses present in the Terms of Service of Perplexity AI, Inc. The case PS13123, initiated on May 21, 2026, will evaluate whether these conditions create a significant imbalance to the detriment of consumers, as established in Article 33 of the Consumer Code of Italy. Interested parties can submit their written contributions within 30 days from the publication of the announcement.

Clauses Under Review in the Terms of Service of Perplexity AI

The AGCM is analyzing key clauses from the Terms of Service updated as of January 23, 2026, which are available on both the website and mobile application of Perplexity AI. These clauses affect various aspects of the contractual relationship, focusing on:

  • Payment services and collection methods
  • Unilateral modifications of prices, availability, and product features
  • Broad exclusions and limitations of liability
  • Mandatory arbitration agreements and waivers of class actions
  • Grounds for account termination and licenses

Details on the Payment Services and Prices Clause

Perplexity AI states that some services are free and others are paid, charged in United States dollars. Subscriptions can be made via credit card, debit card, or other available means. The company reserves the right to modify prices and service conditions at any time, with reasonable prior notice, except in specific cases stated in the Terms. Any failure in payment results in suspension of access to paid services.

Exclusion and Limitation of Liability

Broad clauses stand out where the company disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the integrity, accuracy, security, or availability of services. Compensation is limited to a maximum of 100 United States dollars or the amount paid in the previous six months, whichever is greater. Accepting the Terms means waiving Perplexity AI from any claims arising from misuse of services or infringement of third-party rights.

“Access and use of the Services is the sole responsibility of the user. Perplexity AI excludes all warranties and conditions, express or implied, including merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose,” — according to the Terms.

Mandatory Arbitration and Waiver of Class Actions in the Terms of Perplexity AI

The agreement imposes that any disputes must be resolved through binding arbitration, in English and under the rules of JAMS in the United States. Both parties waive the right to bring class action lawsuits or be part of them, except for certain exceptions related to individual small claims, injunctive relief, or intellectual property rights. Users have a period of 30 days from their first registration to opt out of the arbitration clause voluntarily.

  • Arbitration covers all disputes related to services and products.
  • Class actions are not permitted unless required by law or unless the waiver is prohibited.
  • Arbitration fees and costs will follow JAMS rules, with adjustments if they become prohibitively expensive for the consumer.

Evaluation for Presumed Contractual Imbalance According to the Consumer Code

The AGCM considers clauses that, alone or collectively, may create an imbalance of rights and obligations to be binding to the detriment of the consumer. Various sections of Article 33 are invoked, covering unilateral powers to modify conditions, limitations of liability, and mandatory arbitration.

The mentioned clauses include the automatic termination of licenses and accounts for breach of the Terms, exclusion of liability for content removal, and the company's authority to transfer contracts without reciprocal possibility for the user.

Participation of Associations and Deadlines for Case PS13123

According to the Regulation on procedures for consumer protection and misleading advertising, the following can participate in the consultation:

  • National professional associations and chambers of commerce
  • Recognized and registered consumer associations according to Article 137 of the Code

Interested parties must send their written contribution to the specific email address indicated by the AGCM in the announcement, specifying their representation and sector accreditation. Comments will not be made public, but can be used in the analysis of case PS13123. When confidentiality elements exist, a non-confidential version of the comment should be provided.

In the documentation submitted, the AGCM requests practical information, prior experience, and observations on the contractual provisions under review, useful for assessing their potentially abusive nature under Italian regulations.

Context: The Importance of Contractual Terms in Artificial Intelligence Services

The artificial intelligence sector, due to its innovative nature and growing presence in the digital economy, has been subject to special scrutiny by competition and consumer protection authorities. Contractual conditions form the legal framework of interaction between users and technologically advanced providers, which is why their technical and legal analysis is essential for the development of the sector.

The procedure initiated by the AGCM and the resulting consultation set an additional precedent for international companies offering advanced services, including gaming and digital platforms, regarding transparency obligations and legal balances with their users.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the AGCM study in the consultation on Perplexity AI?

The AGCM examines whether certain clauses in the Terms of Service of Perplexity AI create a significant imbalance to the detriment of the consumer, focusing on liability limitations, payment methods, unilateral modifications, and mandatory arbitration.

Who can participate in the AGCM PS13123 consultation?

National professional and consumer associations, as well as chambers of commerce, can participate by submitting written contributions to the designated address within the set 30 days.

What problematic clauses have been identified in the terms of Perplexity AI?

The clauses under analysis include unilateral price modifications, extensive liability exclusions and limitations, binding arbitration agreements, and automatic account terminations for alleged contractual breaches.

What is the deadline for submitting comments to the AGCM about this case?

The deadline is 30 days from the announcement publication; comments must be submitted via email, identifying representation and sector interest in accordance with AGCM regulations.

What sector does the procedure initiated by the AGCM against Perplexity AI affect?

The procedure affects the provision of artificial intelligence services, a relevant sector in the digital economy where contractual conditions are crucial for user protection.

Source: AGCM Italy

Tags

agcmconsulta-publicaperplexity-airegulaciónservicios-digitales

About the author

Miguel Sandoval

Miguel Sandoval

Regulatory Affairs Correspondent

Miguel Sandoval tracks gambling legislation, licensing, and regulator enforcement — from Spain's DGOJ and the Latin American authorities to the UKGC, the MGA, and the state-by-state map in North America. The reports answer three questions precisely — what changed, where, and who it affects — with jurisdictions, dates, and penalties cited exactly as published. Operators and compliance officers read Miguel Sandoval to know which rulebook moved before their next meeting.

More from Miguel Sandoval

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.