Ohio Casino Control Commission Orders Licensees to Cut Ties With Prediction Markets
OCCC told licensees to cease support and report compliance to Oct. 30 deadline.

Key Takeaways
- The Ohio Casino Control Commission told licensees to cease supporting unlicensed prediction markets and to notify the commission by Oct. 30 that they are in compliance.
- The OCCC sent cease-and-desist orders earlier this month to 10 exchanges and brokers, giving them until last Friday to stop offering sports event contracts in Ohio.
- Plus500US has confirmed compliance; Kalshi and Polymarket are pursuing litigation while other firms remain in discussions with regulators.
- The OCCC warned non-compliant licensees could face reopened suitability investigations, suspension or revocation of their licenses.
The Ohio Casino Control Commission ordered its sports betting and fantasy licensees to stop providing services to unlicensed prediction markets offering sports event contracts in Ohio and gave firms until Oct. 30 to notify the commission that they are in compliance. Interim Executive Director Andromeda Morrison confirmed at the commission's Wednesday meeting that the OCCC sent a letter saying it is “deeply concerned” some licensees “continue to facilitate, support, or otherwise provide services” to those operators.
What the OCCC has directed licensees to do
The commission’s letter requires immediate cessation of activities that support unlicensed sports event contract operators and sets a firm reporting deadline of Oct. 30 for licensees and applicants to notify the OCCC that they have complied. The guidance treats the following as licensees for purposes of the directive: fantasy contest operators; sports gaming proprietors; management services providers; mobile management services providers; suppliers; key employees of proprietors, management services providers and suppliers; certified independent integrity monitors; certified independent testing laboratories; and applicants for any of these licenses or certifications.
The OCCC said it has received reports that licensees are providing services to prediction markets, including liquidity provision and market making, integrity monitoring, and equipment, data security and other technology-related services. The commission described those relationships as raising “significant suitability concerns” and warned that failure to comply could prompt reopened suitability investigations, suspension or revocation of licenses.
"A licensee’s decision to provide services to, partner with or otherwise support an entity engaged in unlicensed sports gaming in Ohio reflects on the licensee’s character, integrity, honesty, and reputation," the OCCC wrote.
How this follows prior enforcement steps
Ohio secured a Sixth Circuit ruling that cleared the way for the state to enforce its gambling laws against prediction markets, which otherwise fall under the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission's regulation. After that decision the OCCC issued cease-and-desist orders earlier this month to 10 exchanges and brokers, giving them until last Friday to stop offering sports event contracts in Ohio.
The commission told Legal Sports Report that Plus500US is the only operator to have confirmed compliance. Two operators, Kalshi and Polymarket as of Monday, are pursuing litigation against the commission, while the remaining firms remain in discussions with regulators.
Exceptions and ongoing engagement
The OCCC included an exception for licensees that also operate as futures commission merchants or introducing brokers. Those firms remain compliant only if they block customers in Ohio from directly or indirectly accessing sports event contracts. The commission said it has had dialogue with a number of companies and described many of those conversations as occurring in "good faith."
At the monthly meeting, Morrison said the commission has had "productive conversations with several of these companies" and that the matters remain under investigation. Chairman Thomas Stickrath added a lighter note at the meeting, quipping about the frequency of litigation the commission faces.
The letter places a continuing suitability obligation on every covered licensee and applicant; the OCCC warned non-compliance may lead to disciplinary action under state licensure rules. The commission is monitoring the situation and expects licensees to respond by the Oct. 30 compliance notice deadline.
Frequently Asked Questions
What deadline did the OCCC give licensees to show compliance?
The OCCC gave licensees and applicants until Oct. 30 to notify the commission that they are in compliance with its directive to cease supporting unlicensed prediction markets. The letter requires immediate cessation of the specified activities and a compliance notice by that date.
Which operators received cease-and-desist orders from the OCCC?
The commission issued cease-and-desist orders earlier this month to 10 exchanges and brokers, and it gave those operators until last Friday to stop offering sports event contracts in Ohio. The OCCC told Legal Sports Report that Plus500US is the only operator to have confirmed compliance.
Are there any exceptions to the OCCC's directive?
Yes. The OCCC included an exception for licensees that also operate as futures commission merchants or introducing brokers, provided those firms block customers in Ohio from directly or indirectly accessing sports event contracts.
What services did the OCCC say raise suitability concerns?
The commission said it is aware of licensees providing liquidity provision and market making, integrity monitoring, and equipment, data security and other technology-related services to prediction markets, and it characterised those relationships as raising significant suitability concerns.
Tags
About the author

Eleanor Whitfield
Regulatory Affairs Correspondent
Eleanor Whitfield tracks gambling legislation, licensing decisions, and regulator enforcement across key markets — from the UKGC, MGA, and Germany's GGL to Spain's DGOJ and the state-by-state map in the Americas. The reporting answers three questions precisely: what changed, where, and who it affects, with jurisdictions, effective dates, and penalty figures named exactly as published. Compliance officers and operators read Eleanor Whitfield to know which rulebook moved before their next board meeting.
More from Eleanor Whitfield








