iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Prediction Market

Lithuania Orders Block of Polymarket for Unlicensed Betting

The Lithuanian gaming regulator instructed the blocking of Polymarket, considering its 'prediction market' model as unauthorized betting.

By Renata QuirogaPublished Sep 21, 20264 min readEurope
Editorial capture with Polymarket logo and blocked site notice on digital screen, representing regulatory intervention.

Key Takeaways

  • The Lithuanian authority ordered the blocking of Polymarket for operating unlicensed betting.
  • The measure includes cutting web access and payments, backed by court decision.
  • Lithuania has now blocked 2,204 illegal remote gambling sites to date.
  • Other European markets like France, Germany, and Italy have also restricted Polymarket.

The Lithuanian Gaming Supervisory Authority has ordered the blocking of Polymarket, an international prediction market platform, considering it operates unlicensed betting in the country. The authority acted after receiving judicial support from the Regional Administrative Court, pointing to Adventure One QSS, Inc., the operator responsible for Polymarket, for attempting to evade restrictions on unauthorized remote gambling in Lithuania.

Why Was Polymarket Blocked in Lithuania?

The measure responds to the regulator's conclusion that Polymarket's services equate to unlicensed betting activities, despite presenting itself as a "prediction market" where users trade odds on the outcomes of various events. Following the investigation, the authority pointed out clear signs of betting:

"Although the website claimed to offer the ability to participate in a 'prediction market', the investigation identified signs of gambling. Such gambling was offered without a license or permission." (Lithuanian Gaming Supervisory Authority)

The order instructed communications service providers to block access to the site and demanded payment service providers to halt transactions related to Adventure One QSS, Inc. This is the first time the authority has acted against a prediction market operator in the country.

Polymarket's Business Model Under Regulatory Scrutiny

The Lithuanian case reflects a growing trend in Europe where several regulators question whether prediction platforms offer covert betting. Polymarket insists that it only offers a prediction market, where participants "buy or sell" their forecasts, but Lithuanian state supervision concluded that this represents a form of gambling without state authorization.

This conflict is not new in Europe. Regulatory authorities in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain have also limited access to Polymarket. In most of these markets, the central argument is that the incentive structures and financial outcomes in these prediction markets resemble traditional betting too closely, violating local regulations concerning remote gambling and licenses.

Regulatory Actions and Compliance in the Lithuanian Market

The Lithuanian Gaming Supervisory Authority, responsible for overseeing and controlling local gambling, has blocked 2,204 illegal remote gambling sites in its efforts to combat unregulated gambling. To reinforce compliance, in addition to restricting digital access, the regulator ordered national payment providers to interrupt any transactions linked to Polymarket, a key measure to cut off financial channels and limit the operations of unauthorized sites.

Judicial Decision and its Effects on Online Payments

The intervention was backed by a decision from the Regional Administrative Court, facilitating the issuance of binding instructions to telecommunications companies and payment processing firms. In this way, not only is access restricted, but also the ability to process funds through Lithuanian fintech platforms and banks.

Debate Over Unlicensed Betting and Fintechs in Lithuania

The issue of unlicensed gambling sparks debate in the Lithuanian industry. The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) recently reported that Walletto, a local fintech firm, has processed payments for unauthorized online gambling operators. Such allegations have placed collaboration within the sector and the impact of financial service providers on the integrity of the licensing system at the center of discussion.

The case of Polymarket thus fits within a zero-tolerance policy of the regulator towards any form of unauthorized remote gambling, especially since the platform attracts local users through alternative digital channels and global payment methods. Oversight extends not only to the technical blocking of websites but also to the monitoring of payment channels.

European Context: The Advance of Blocks Against Polymarket

Aside from Lithuania, countries like France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain have pushed similar restrictions against Polymarket, in all cases as a result of regulatory interpretations that "prediction markets" functionally fit within the definition of unauthorized remote betting. These actions are part of a regional trend to restrict platforms that, without local licenses, allow users to bet digitally on a variety of events, from electoral outcomes to sports events.

Regulation of gambling in Europe is updated in the face of challenges from new hybrid platforms, and regulators are refining criteria that, traditionally, only applied to sports betting or casinos, but now extend to emerging models in the digital sector.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Lithuania block access to Polymarket?

Lithuania blocked Polymarket after determining that its prediction market model constitutes remote betting conducted without the necessary local license or permit. The regulator addressed that, despite the designation of 'prediction', the activity fits the legal definitions of illegal online gambling.

What measures did the regulator take to ensure the block?

The regulator issued binding instructions to communication providers to block access to the Polymarket website and also ordered payment service providers to terminate all transactions with Adventure One QSS, Inc.

Is this the first time Lithuania has acted against a prediction market?

Yes, this is the first action taken by the Lithuanian Gaming Supervisory Authority against a prediction market operator, marking a precedent in the monitoring of non-traditional betting models.

Which European markets have made similar decisions against Polymarket?

Regulators in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain have imposed restrictions on Polymarket under similar regulatory arguments, seeking to control remote gambling without local licensing.

How do payment service providers contribute to the fight against unlicensed gambling?

Payment service providers play a key role in cutting off funding channels to unauthorized sites, as illustrated by the Polymarket case in Lithuania, where the suspension of transactions related to operator Adventure One QSS, Inc. was ordered.

Tags

polymarketlithuaniaregulationunlicensed-bettingprediction-market

About the author

Renata Quiroga

Renata Quiroga

Betting Markets Correspondent

Renata Quiroga covers sports betting and prediction markets — sportsbook launches, odds technology, event contracts, and the regulatory calls that decide what can be bet on and where. The reports open with the product or the ruling, name operators and platforms precisely, and explain the mechanics without needless jargon. When a book enters a Latin American market or a prediction exchange lists a contested contract, Renata Quiroga reports what changes for the bettor.

More from Renata Quiroga

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.