iGAMINGHOUSE
Breaking
Prediction Market

Utah Sues Kalshi to Recover $30.6–$61.2M and Block Contracts

State seeks to shut Kalshi out of Utah and force geolocation and profit surrender.

By Tessa ColemanPublished Oct 23, 20262 min readUSA
Utah Attorney General Derek Brown announces lawsuit against prediction market operator Kalshi with courtroom and legal documents in background

Key Takeaways

  • Utah filed suit against Kalshi on 22 October 2026 seeking to block its event contracts in the state.
  • The complaint alleges Kalshi collected between $30.6 million and $61.2 million in fees from Utah customers.
  • More than 32,000 Utah residents had verified accounts on Kalshi as of February, the complaint says.
  • Utah wants Kalshi to implement court-approved geolocation controls and surrender allegedly unlawful profits.

Utah filed suit against Kalshi on Tuesday, 22 October 2026, asking a state court to block the prediction market operator from offering sports and other event contracts in the state and to recover between $30.6 million and $61.2 million in fees the complaint says Kalshi collected from Utah customers. Attorney General Derek Brown announced the filing at a Tuesday news conference and said Utah wants Kalshi to pull its offerings, implement court-approved geolocation controls and surrender allegedly unlawful profits.

The complaint's figures and defendants

The lawsuit alleges Kalshi collected between $30.6 million and $61.2 million in fees from Utah customers. The complaint states more than 32,000 Utah residents had verified accounts on the platform as of February. The suit names Kalshi affiliates and trading firms Susquehanna International Group and Susquehanna Government Products as defendants alongside Kalshi.

"Utah has said no to gambling since statehood in 1896, and that didn’t change when betting moved onto cellphones," Attorney General Derek Brown said at the news conference.

Kalshi argues the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over its event contracts as federally regulated financial derivatives. A company spokesperson said, "As a national derivatives market overseen by the CFTC, Kalshi answers to federal law, and no single state should have a veto over it."

The state suit follows an August federal court ruling that held Utah's gambling laws are not preempted by federal commodities law. Kalshi sought relief from the 10th Circuit, which denied an injunction pending appeal. Federal appeals courts remain split: the Third Circuit ruled for Kalshi in its dispute with New Jersey, while the Sixth Circuit rejected Kalshi's preemption arguments in cases involving Ohio and Tennessee. New Jersey has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the split.

Remedies Utah seeks

Utah is asking the state court to: 1) shut down Kalshi's operations in Utah; 2) force removal of event contracts from the state; 3) require court-approved geolocation controls; and 4) recover tens of millions in alleged unlawful profits.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Utah asking the court to do in its suit against Kalshi?

Utah is asking a state court to shut down Kalshi's operations in Utah, remove its event contract offerings from the state, require court-approved geolocation controls and recover tens of millions in alleged unlawful profits. The complaint specifies the recovery sought as between $30.6 million and $61.2 million.

On what basis does Kalshi say it should not be subject to Utah law?

Kalshi maintains that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over its event contracts as federally regulated financial derivatives, and the company said it answers to federal law rather than any single state.

How many Utah residents used Kalshi, according to the complaint?

The complaint states that more than 32,000 Utah residents had verified accounts on Kalshi as of February.

What federal rulings are relevant to the Utah case?

An August federal court ruling found Utah's gambling laws are not preempted by federal commodities law; the 10th Circuit denied Kalshi's request for an injunction pending appeal. Appeals courts are split, with the Third Circuit siding with Kalshi in a New Jersey case and the Sixth Circuit rejecting Kalshi's preemption arguments in Ohio and Tennessee.

Tags

kalshiutah-lawsuitprediction-marketsregulation

About the author

Tessa Coleman

Tessa Coleman

Betting Markets Correspondent

Tessa Coleman covers betting products and markets — sportsbook launches, odds and trading technology, and the fast-growing prediction-market space from regulated exchanges to event contracts. The stories lead with the product or the ruling, name the operators and platforms precisely, and translate trading jargon into what bettors can actually do. When a book reworks its pricing or a prediction market wins a license fight, Tessa Coleman explains the mechanics and the stakes.

More from Tessa Coleman

Related Articles

Gamble Responsibly

NCPGMalta Gaming AuthorityGambleAwareGLIGamCareeCOGRA18+

iGamingHouse is intended for users who are 18 years or older (or the legal age in your jurisdiction). Ensure online gambling is legal in your region before participating. Seek help from professional resources if you feel you have a gambling problem. Terms and conditions apply. All rights reserved © 2026.